Or, we do a step up from what Cabulb said and...well, a cpupel steps up, and combine two ideas. If you shoot in the NFZ, station becomes hostile. ANd, isntead of half th strength of stationary BS's, we make them all Isis powered.
no. no fire zones are not server regulated zones. they are a roleplaying concept. what ifd someone attacks me just outside the freeport and i have to defend myself? and this happened multiple times in the past.
NFZ is an inRP rule not a server one. So boys and girls, ignore the non-fire zone, pirate zoners, burn down the freeports and blow up their juggernauts.
and what if you are inside the "NFZ" and your attacker is outside of it, shooting at you?
You see there are so many flaws with this idea, that it shouldn't be implemented. You should never have to depend on an NPC ship/station to defend you. Nor fear that the station will open up on you with its guns for defending yourselves.
Current system is fine and if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
' Wrote:NFZ is an inRP rule not a server one. So boys and girls, ignore the non-fire zone, pirate zoners, burn down the freeports and blow up their juggernauts.
Just make sure you don't land on the nearest one for chill out 10 minutes after.
Holy crap this is still going. I forgot to check this:D
I agree the NFZ would be abused and people would make an absolute mockery of it. The EMP was something that just popped in to mind and i wanted to get some feedback from it:)