4.86 ships

[Jinx]

you can always veto a ship - but you ll have to take it to the community first. just cause one person does not like a ship doesn t mean others share the opinion. - when the veto is based on the roleplay/balance impact rather than the design though ... a more reasonable discussion can be conducted. ( arguing about style doesn t work, cause its subjective )

the new hathor is supposed to be included, yes. - mostly cause the old model is not meeting design qualities in terms of meshwork.

edit:

you should never veto a ship out of a personal grudge or malicious attempt. - you should also not use any argument containing "deserving or undeserving" cause it simply never applies to anything here. so - e.g. the not-so-subtle comment about "a faction that was sanctioned and still getting a shipline" wouldn t work here; cause it matters not if someone was sanctioned or not at all when it comes to ships.

we assume that someone that was sanctioned is completely rehabilitated after the sanction anyway - that is what a punishment is for ... to get even with the community.

---

Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC

[Huhuh]

you should never veto a ship out of a personal grudge or malicious attempt.

I just wanna make it clear that I have nothing against the CR as I have never met them.
I've only heard that they're notorious. So I'll not pass judgment.

Back on topic. If the list isn't current atm, maybe I'll get to see the new junker ship they were planning (junker cap :ylove:).

Also with the new Hathor, is it gonna retain the 8 turret forward awesomeness? Will it be more agile? Or will it be smaller, more nimble and with a few less turrets? A picture of the final product would be good too. As you may have guessed, I lurve the Hathor.

---

[Jinx]

most revisions are meant to be purely cosmetic - so the hathor keeps all its characteristics and hitbox and everything - only the shape changes slightly

---

Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC