Roc vs Havoc Mk II

[Mickk]

I've flown both, although not in 'anger' (PvP), but both fly very nicely for bombers.

I think the Havok might be slightly faster turning wise, but pretty much choice seems to come down to how 'pretty' you like your ships.

I don't know what FLStat says performance wise about the two, but I can look and post specs if they are wanted.

---

Mickk: One orginal, 4 clones. Telp..teleh....mind comu...comi..come...talking ability.
A possibly very ordinary signature coming soon.
Lost your FL ID? Have NOT reinstalled your OS? Click here!

[Blaze]

I say Roc Rocks But anyone know about the Performance of the Waran?

---

- Complete Version of Server Rules
- Discovery Wiki
- Tutorials & Support Forum
- Click here for lulz

[paradoxx]

i fly the Roc and that is a very good bomber

---

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe; Einstein Albert.

[Bear]

I say Roc Rocks But anyone know about the Performance of the Waran?

*makes fingers into cross symbol*

NO, THE EVIL WARAN IS UPON US

*clears throat* ahem, anyway, yes why not the Waran?

---

 

[Rudo]

I take back what I said about the Havoc. Some sneaky dev changed it. It is a surprisingly not-bad bomber now. Slightly less agile than the Roc, but with more regens and durability.

---

[Kazinsal]

CUPHOLDER!!

Roc > Havoc... I don't know why the [LN] wiki page still says you can use one...

---

Retired, permanently.

[Quorg]

No, Ivan, Xenos do NOT get to use the Havoc.

Of course, if they want to arrange a deal behind the scenes, then that's up to them.

---

ATTENTION SMUGGLERS
The Midnight Express: A Slaver <strike>who doesn't completely realize what he's doing.</strike> (video)

Quorg, you're officially a moron.

...mongs like Quorg being like a malignant little cancer...

Way to be useless, Quorg.