(02-03-2014, 01:04 PM)Highland Laddie Wrote: I hope this just doesn't encourage the infants to continue in their whining. It's barely tolerable as it is.
No, it probably won't. Comments like this however will do just that. Can we please try to refrain from this?
For the rest of you.......This is done. Anyone else who posts in this thread trying to incite more complaints will not be posting in this thread anymore.
(02-03-2014, 04:49 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: It would've been criminal if this was allowed to continue, the congress cannot deny that the base was moved ooRPly. The only real RP justification that I can have coming to my mind is that the base somehow fell through a inter-system leeds jump hole and winded up at the New London hole.
Aye, maybe you're right there for once, Congress were the scapegoat for Admin mistakes, you can't deny that either!
(02-03-2014, 04:49 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: Besides Congress, Rayburn being at the NL hole didn't make a difference to the base's own RP and purpose. If anything, getting it moved gave people an idea of where it was located. No doubt a GRN fleet will be inbound in update 6...
And what would you know about Rayburn's RP & purpose? Nothing but a guess!
As for the oorp finding it & the oorp GNR destroying it later on you speak of here,
it would been criminal if this was allowed to continue but who'll get the justice? us?
I think not!
(02-03-2014, 07:38 PM)McNeo Wrote: Seems like you can't move a base to protect a base that unlawfuls camp, because when you do it, unlawfuls whine enough about it to get it moved back.
Congratulations, you reversed the one useful thing the =LSF= has done for Liberty in the last 6 years.
You can't build a base undercover of another, get it established and then move it to a more convenient location where the community had no opportunity of stopping it. Whether it was a useful thing on the part of the =LSF= or not, is irrelevant. This was all about fairness to the community.
I thought it was about how unlawfuls could not go anywhere near possibly the busiest trade lane junction in Liberty, which I'd argue, is probably the way it should be.
To be honest, I find it unfair that unlawfuls can use trade lanes and jump gates to get around, chase their targets and escape. Its lawful equipment that unlawfuls use to get around because it's convenient, so they're as mobile as lawfuls, without the burden of defense.
Yes, I know my point about the =LSF= is irrelevant.
(02-03-2014, 04:49 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: No doubt a GRN fleet will be inbound in update 6...
No plans for anything like that, actually. We weren't going to bother beforehand, and we certainly aren't going to now.
I want nothing to do with PoBs ever again if I can help it, and that includes sieging them. I'd rather gouge out my own eyeballs than siege even a shielded Core 1 again, after that Border Station One mess.
![[Image: rSYoqYY.png]](https://i.imgur.com/rSYoqYY.png)
![[Image: RKaqSve.png]](https://i.imgur.com/RKaqSve.png)
![[Image: omicega.gif]](https://sig.grumpybumpers.com/host/omicega.gif)