• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
Technology Chart
Rep hack list
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
Mactan Network
DarkStat
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 85 86 87 88 89 … 545 Next »
Heavy bomber / light bomber

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Gallic Lawful Bounties 1 - 1 / 1,000
Gallic Lawful Bounties 2 - 6 / 1,000
Gallic Unlawful Bounties 1 - 6 / 1,000
Gallic Unlawful Bounties 2 - 9 / 1,000

Latest activity

Poll: Should all heavy bombers have 5 forward shooting cannons?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
80.00%
 40 80.00%
No
20.00%
 10 20.00%
Total 50 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Heavy bomber / light bomber
Offline pillow
03-03-2015, 04:16 PM,
#11
Probation
Posts: 1,555
Threads: 27
Joined: May 2014
Staff roles:
Balance Developer

Shows that I don't fly many bombers.
I had no idea there were so many bombers with 5 guns that shoot forwards. The more you know.
(sun)

Now back to the topic of the thread.
Quote:Shows that I don't fly many bombers.
I don't know bombers. I can't make a decision based on them.
Reply  
Offline Shinju
03-03-2015, 04:49 PM,
#12
Federal Humanitarian
Posts: 2,030
Threads: 234
Joined: Jun 2014
Staff roles: Moderator

Give me another gun ((((((((((((((((((((:
"No step on Snek..."
Nome Wrote:my english is my english!
Reply  
Offline Jack_Henderson
03-03-2015, 04:52 PM,
#13
Independent Miners Guild
Posts: 6,103
Threads: 391
Joined: Nov 2010

Would be neat to have some additional punch for heavy bombers.
They kinda suck now anyway as fighter guns were buffed and when there are fighters in a brawl, heavy bombers just die off really quickly. Giving them ability to do some more damage during their limited life-time would make sense, imo.
+ IMG| DISCORD: https://discord.gg/TWrGWjp
+ IMG| IS RECRUITING: Click to find out more!
Reply  
Offline Shinju
03-03-2015, 04:58 PM,
#14
Federal Humanitarian
Posts: 2,030
Threads: 234
Joined: Jun 2014
Staff roles: Moderator

(03-03-2015, 04:52 PM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: Would be neat to have some additional punch for heavy bombers.
They kinda suck now anyway as fighter guns were buffed and when there are fighters in a brawl, heavy bombers just die off really quickly. Giving them ability to do some more damage during their limited life-time would make sense, imo.

It's not about bombers being bad... It's about players and pilots, Jack. Some can handle even 2 vs 1 situation...
"No step on Snek..."
Nome Wrote:my english is my english!
Reply  
Offline Lythrilux
03-03-2015, 05:23 PM,
#15
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,189
Threads: 719
Joined: Jan 2013

I wish all heavy bombers could fire 6 bomber guns/turrets forward. That'd be awesome.
[Image: SQGerWV.png]
Reply  
Offline Vulkhard Muller
03-03-2015, 06:28 PM,
#16
Junker Congress
Posts: 2,213
Threads: 375
Joined: Feb 2012

(03-03-2015, 05:23 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: I wish all heavy bombers could fire 6 bomber guns/turrets forward. That'd be awesome.

Didn't the waran used to do that?
Reply  
Offline Pepe
03-03-2015, 06:30 PM,
#17
Moderately rare
Posts: 1,956
Threads: 111
Joined: Apr 2011

(03-03-2015, 05:23 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: I wish all heavy bombers could fire 6 bomber guns/turrets forward. That'd be awesome.

I was thinking more in that direction, but had no guts to propose it in the first step. They have a core to support all 6, actually. Shinju would be the only reason not to let it happen, but we can ban her anyway Smile

Light bombers with 5 front firing cannons/turrets? Sounds unfair to me. One of them can kill a VHF (from my perspective), no matter which pilot is better.

Medium bombers could use 5. They would trade agility for a gun and more power, imho.
Reply  
Offline Shinju
03-03-2015, 06:46 PM,
#18
Federal Humanitarian
Posts: 2,030
Threads: 234
Joined: Jun 2014
Staff roles: Moderator

(03-03-2015, 06:30 PM)Pepe Wrote: Shinju would be the only reason not to let it happen, but we can ban her anyway Smile

Do I need to be scared now? Sad
"No step on Snek..."
Nome Wrote:my english is my english!
Reply  
Offline Lythrilux
03-03-2015, 06:47 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-03-2015, 06:48 PM by Lythrilux.)
#19
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,189
Threads: 719
Joined: Jan 2013

(03-03-2015, 06:28 PM)Vulkhard Muller Wrote:
(03-03-2015, 05:23 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: I wish all heavy bombers could fire 6 bomber guns/turrets forward. That'd be awesome.

Didn't the waran used to do that?

Yep, it was a bug though. A pretty neat bug, if I do say so myself. We should reapply it to all heavy bombers.
[Image: SQGerWV.png]
Reply  
Offline SnakThree
03-03-2015, 06:51 PM,
#20
Member
Posts: 9,089
Threads: 337
Joined: Mar 2010

I would be ok with Heavy/Medium/Light Bombers with 5/4/3 forward facing weapons.
[Image: rTrJole.png][Image: LJ88XSk.png]
[Image: ka0AQa5.png][Image: QwWqCS8.png]
  Reply  
Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode