(12-19-2015, 01:56 AM)Hidamari Wrote: uhm, well yea people use razors.. ? okay? razors are anti fighter,
Not just fighters. But anti-GB, as well as anti light cruiser.
(12-19-2015, 01:56 AM)Hidamari Wrote: cerbs compete with mortars not razors, cerbs were SO good nobody used mortars anymore, and there is no way to make mortars anywhere near as good as cerbs were without making them literally insane.
They're weren't 'so good'. They just worked. They weren't broken, or overpowered. They did their job. The problem was Mortars and Missiles being kind of meh.
Battleship Razors are an excellent example of the approach devs should be taking. Ok, old Battleship razors were crap, so you buff them to give them new roles. Nowadays Battleship Razors were an amazing improvement to class. Similar approaches should be taken with Mortars and Missiles.
(12-19-2015, 01:58 AM)sindroms Wrote: So wait.
Instead of making other weapons more viable for heavy slots, you nerf cerbs.
Is that how you are doing things?
And then make snubs better against caps?
Yeah, okay.
Okay.
Have fun sitting in Conn with your 1v1 snubfights for the rest of whatever length Disco survives.
Demonstrate to me how nerfing cerbs affected cap/snub balance in the slightest and I will personally write out a check to you for $100.
Yes, battleships need a buff. That doesn't mean cerbs aren't the be-all end-all of battleship combat and needed to be toned down.
Posts: 6,254
Threads: 484
Joined: Nov 2014
Staff roles: Art Developer
is this april the first?
is it really?
I mean, good effort on trying to make mortars not useless, but, they're still somewhat useless. They certainly need a bit more of a damage buff. Make BS cerbs as 3k, otherwise, bye-bye light battleships.
Oh yeah nerf the Geb already it's tiny as heck, and give a minor buff to the Mako, it's just deathbait.