(04-05-2017, 05:13 PM)Chrysalis Wrote: We've talked to the member in question and made him understand that this is wrong. He agreed to stop acting like this. Hopefully, it won't happen again.
Note that we have younger members who don't have the ingame experience like those who are here for a very long while. But don't worry, our instruction courses are very.. efficient
PS: I'd like to summon the depths of the void to give us an update about our official status request.
Rudimentary creatures of blood and flesh, you touch my mind, fumbling in ignorance, incapable of understanding. - Sovereign
(04-05-2017, 08:13 PM)Dave.Synk Wrote: Note that we have younger members who don't have the ingame experience like those who are here for a very long while. But don't worry, our instruction courses are very.. efficient
PS: I'd like to summon the depths of the void to give us an update about our official status request.
Fool, you cannot summon from the depths of the void, you must be a wizzard to do so.
(04-05-2017, 05:40 PM)meliva Wrote: Wasn't it 2 fighters vs 1 otherwise? Perhaps explain the whole situation instead of intentionally omitting important facts just because you are upset of losing. I'm saying this as a bystander who was there when it happened.
Didn't make any difference to the cruiser cruising up and going weapons free, which happened for a good two minutes before anybody else showed (I wasn't aware anybody else was showing, and I certainly didn't call for backup nor expect backup from a Folorn member). Result would have been the same without the Folorn, or with - a fighter cannot dogfight with a cruiser.
(04-06-2017, 10:46 AM)Tænì Wrote: Didn't make any difference to the cruiser cruising up and going weapons free, which happened for a good two minutes before anybody else showed (I wasn't aware anybody else was showing, and I certainly didn't call for backup nor expect backup from a Folorn member). Result would have been the same without the Folorn, or with - a fighter cannot dogfight with a cruiser.
Situation resolved now anyway.
Athenian Wrote:
The only issues that may be raised here:
3) Poor in-game behaviour, characterised by repeated incidents which are harmful to server gameplay, and not merely once-off incidents or the exercise of tactical advantage, such as outnumbering, outgunning or outthinking an opponent.
Having a dessie + starting a dogfight = tactical outplay? Nope. By this logic, your everyday LNS.Razor.Solaris caps are masters of benign gameplay when they 1/ 2/ commune snubs.
Again, situation is resolved, in Lerdi's own words, and I am satisfied with the outcome and bare no resentment to the player or the faction. Ssh. Remember, I am fond of Commune and consider this resolved. Don't, Tick-Tack. If you disagree with my perspective you could always send a PM rather than gun for public justifications. This ain't a tiff thread and I won't be replying here any longer unless I have something new to bring up.
Edit: The member was new, situation was resolved, he learnt from it, he's a fun dude and I hope to run into him once more, I'm eating my eggs sunny-side up this morning, Commune still deserves officialdom. This was a minor incident and it was responded to professionally.
Having a dessie + starting a dogfight = tactical outplay? Nope. By this logic, your everyday LNS.Razor.Solaris caps are masters of benign gameplay when they 1/ 2/ commune snubs.
Again, situation is resolved, in Lerdi's own words, and I am satisfied with the outcome and bare no resentment to the player or the faction. Ssh. Remember, I am fond of Commune and consider this resolved. Don't, Tick-Tack. If you disagree with my perspective you could always send a PM rather than gun for public justifications. This ain't a tiff thread and I won't be replying here any longer unless I have something new to bring up.
Edit: The member was new, situation was resolved, he learnt from it, he's a fun dude and I hope to run into him once more, I'm eating my eggs sunny-side up this morning, Commune still deserves officialdom. This was a minor incident and it was responded to professionally.
I was simply informing you that situations involving gank are best resolved in skype rather than going public and posting it in feedback... where it doesn't belong, thought it might be best to nip this one in the bud since I don't want to see ganking complaints here all day long.
Now is there anything else you have to add rather than feeling a necessary urge to throw accusations my way as to gunning for you? ... on second thought don't answer that pm me instead.
Dear administrators. I hope you keep in mind what you have told us about last weekend and the voting.
However, since it's been already a month after we've passed the 2 months period, and it's still being unknown will we get our official status or not, even with the amount of activity and RP we did, there has been a slight drop of our activity in game and on forums. A bit.
That's due to fact most of us are busy with work, and daily real life obligations. We can as well see that it reflects whole server population as well.
Though, I will get to the point. I would kindly ask you people to, due to these facts above - have them in mind when you will be voting on our request. It's been affected with the time we still wait for the green clarification.
It is understandable that you might be busy with keeping server in a good state, and that there's work with the new version coming. Understand us as well then as you expect us to understand you.
I only hope you will value our effort, and have all factors that I've stated on your mind.
