(12-02-2017, 09:24 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: From what I am hearing, this did not have Aoi approval. It had minor consultation, but that the Arch was not on the table.
LOL and the large chat that took many days to discuss was "minor"
no... no it was not. Please stop twisting the facts.
Why did you quote what I said 40 minutes ago? After further investigation, we've formed a more conclusive image of what's going on. Antonio didn't really care about the event, but he decisively said the Arch was not up for takes.
I gave him the option to have something to care about. It's up to him as to how he chooses to deal with that.
He showed interest in having PVP happen and activity. It's different than not caring at all.
1) I had made the large effort to try to contact devs to ask about the blueprints. Actually, I believe i asked Nierdackle who then asked and they said it was fine.
AFC will be using the Satsuma as it's intended purpose: HIGH LUXURY YACHT. #Party_City. We are planning to have it into a NPC base and to have a flyable version that will inRP fly around sirius. For the maintenance, all it takes is hiring the required crew and help which will be solved in the SRP progression stream.
AFC has done lots of party ship RP in the past so this Rp is not new.
2) Frankfurt - Sigma JG going down could also not be altered by players. And yet, the Admins did it. The gate is also not fixed yet, as I have not seen repairing event for it.
3) Please read the RP linked that explains how the order and BD would get from this.
For me, it still looks like a prepared event in order for AFC to obtain their SRP cool ship. Hmph hmph.
Anyways, I won't assure Oracle presence if this happens - unless you spoke with @HuggieSunrise.
Some people get events going with intention to powergame through their way into cool ships despite having no logical reasoning behind whole "siege Nomad lair" while others get banned for trying to forge evidence of hostile rival faction smuggling some cardamine/artifacts. Legit standards.
1) I had made the large effort to try to contact devs to ask about the blueprints. Actually, I believe i asked Nierdackle who then asked and they said it was fine.
AFC will be using the Satsuma as it's intended purpose: HIGH LUXURY YACHT. #Party_City. We are planning to have it into a NPC base and to have a flyable version that will inRP fly around sirius. For the maintenance, all it takes is hiring the required crew and help which will be solved in the SRP progression stream.
AFC has done lots of party ship RP in the past so this Rp is not new.
2) Frankfurt - Sigma JG going down could also not be altered by players. And yet, the Admins did it. The gate is also not fixed yet, as I have not seen repairing event for it.
3) Please read the RP linked that explains how the order and BD would get from this.
For me, it still looks like a prepared event in order for AFC to obtain their SRP cool ship. Hmph hmph.
Anyways, I won't assure Oracle presence if this happens - unless you spoke with @HuggieSunrise.
Huggie did not want to speak about this at all from the start. He acted very immaturely about it actually and was unwilling to communicate.
It is an event to progress the story for the SRP. Do i need to apologies to people for trying to include people into my RP? All I am doing is making the SRP richer and exciting instead of "i stole it" on forums
(12-02-2017, 10:33 PM)SnakThree Wrote: Some people get events going with intention to powergame through their way into cool ships despite having no logical reasoning behind whole "siege Nomad lair" while others get banned for trying to forge evidence of hostile rival faction smuggling some cardamine/artifacts. Legit standards.
(12-02-2017, 10:33 PM)SnakThree Wrote: Some people get events going with intention to powergame through their way into cool ships despite having no logical reasoning behind whole "siege Nomad lair" while others get banned for trying to forge evidence of hostile rival faction smuggling some cardamine/artifacts. Legit standards.
Can you please not trial-by-form?
Am I not allowed to compare currently planned big pile of powergamey bullcrap to my own small pile of powergamey bullcrap? If you don't want to see these kinds of comments from me or anyone else, I highly suggest thinking of logical events that are about fun and activity rather than end-result for egoistical purposes.
(12-02-2017, 10:33 PM)SnakThree Wrote: Some people get events going with intention to powergame through their way into cool ships despite having no logical reasoning behind whole "siege Nomad lair" while others get banned for trying to forge evidence of hostile rival faction smuggling some cardamine/artifacts. Legit standards.
Can you please not trial-by-form?
Am I not allowed to compare currently planned big pile of powergamey bullcrap to my own small pile of powergamey bullcrap? If you don't want to see these kinds of comments from me or anyone else, I highly suggest thinking of logical events that are about fun and activity rather than end-result for egoistical purposes.
This event is about fun, activity, and about an end result.
if i am putting this much of pain and suffering as I am getting right now for a stupid event, i should get something at least out of it.
For crying out loud, there is still SO much RP to be done. Its not like I magically get a battleship form this one event. For god sakes
How is this different than a faction wanting a shiny new ship and doing X amount of cargo to make it? That can be classifed as power gaming too.
Any SRP people does has a result to it. Im sorry that you all are jelous but in this reality, if people do something, they also want a return on investment.
(12-02-2017, 10:34 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: Huggie did not want to speak about this at all from the start. He acted very immaturely about it actually and was unwilling to communicate.
(12-02-2017, 10:34 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: Can you please not trial-by-form?
(12-02-2017, 10:34 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: Huggie did not want to speak about this at all from the start. He acted very immaturely about it actually and was unwilling to communicate.
(12-02-2017, 10:34 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: Can you please not trial-by-form?
Yeah trial-by-form indicates you are accusing people of breaking the rules publicly on forum