Also, when I made my very first "ban me for ever for thou hath done wrong upon me" (and got banned forever), the little 14 yo critter that caused it was actually telling me "I can break rules against you because admins like me and dont like you because you said they suck". There was also like at least 3 confirmed pedos in the admin team at the time.
Just sayin' ...
And people have previously been banned for questioning other people's state of mental development. Can confirm. Some of them banned for ever, multiple times.
(04-09-2021, 01:13 AM)Karlotta Wrote: Also, when I made my very first "ban me for ever for thou hath done wrong upon me" (and got banned forever), the little 14 yo critter that caused it was actually telling me "I can break rules against you because admins like me and dont like you because you said they suck". There was also like at least 3 confirmed pedos in the admin team at the time.
Just sayin' ...
And people have previously been banned for questioning other people's state of mental development. Can confirm. Some of them banned for ever, multiple times.
(04-08-2021, 10:25 PM)Emperor Tekagi Wrote: But who in their right mind considers this two lines you replied with in the sanction thread as actual harassment?
Probably nobody. It's just that certain admins are still too much of a flower to underline parts or put them in bold or in other manner make clear which part of the rule was actually violated.
And this after they have been encouraged to do it several times in their year long career of admins.
Last time they received such advice they just correct imagined spelling errors in the suggestion, only to later find out that they were in fact introducing spelling errors instead of identifying them correctly.
Btw, I typed out "flower", not the other word that it is replaced by it in the filter.