• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 556 557 558 559 560 … 778 Next »
It's time to do some Light Carrier control..

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (8): « Previous 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
It's time to do some Light Carrier control..
Offline worldstrider
04-18-2009, 04:19 PM,
#61
Member
Posts: 1,420
Threads: 78
Joined: Feb 2008

I just have problems with any suggestion that contains the words "other players" "Tenacity" and "control".

[Image: Tink_Shadow.png]
  Reply  
Offline Jinx
04-18-2009, 04:27 PM,
#62
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

in suggestions like these - the term "the others" or "other players" or "you know... those lolwut players" always appear.

you ll hardly ever hear - "lets not fly that ship anymore and i will make the first step and sell mine!"

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Offline worldstrider
04-18-2009, 06:10 PM,
#63
Member
Posts: 1,420
Threads: 78
Joined: Feb 2008

' Wrote:in suggestions like these - the term "the others" or "other players" or "you know... those lolwut players" always appear.

you ll hardly ever hear - "lets not fly that ship anymore and i will make the first step and sell mine!"


Delightfully appropriate Jinx! I believe you have made your only half-armed opponents completely witless now;)

[Image: Tink_Shadow.png]
  Reply  
Guest
04-18-2009, 07:21 PM,
#64
Unregistered
 

I am happy to see the last Keeper invasion went well, only one person was moved to bastille this time. :lol:

We warned the capital ships to stay back, and let the fighters DO THE JOB and COOPERATE TOGETHER. They took down most of the keepers when one of Keepers arrived with a gunboat. It is when that I asked permission to engage it, as it was eating through our forces. And as soon as that Gunboat was destroyed, I pulled back and let the fighters fighting other fighters.

We try to train our people, and it seems to pay off; the problem really isn't capwhoring, the problem was the lack of fighter. (And I'm sure everyone will agree on this.) Earlier today, we had the proof that fighters probably are the best thing to counter anything, and that capwhoring isn't always this great.
Reply  
Offline Lutz
04-18-2009, 08:08 PM,
#65
Member
Posts: 127
Threads: 16
Joined: May 2008

/singed
I mean a bunch of fighters can destroy even cruisers and battlecruisers.
Its good for teamwork to fly them and also you are much safer cause you are harder to hit than in a cap.
I have a Osiris as my only cap (was a long way to get it) and I really dont think that all players that have a cap are lolwuuters or that the caps should be under faction restriction.
I agree that we have to do something that we dont get to a capwhore faction (like BHG sorry but its true) but controling is the wrong way (rules are good but cant solve every problem) so we should try to show the others that caps arent the best things and should do more fighter/bomber events. For example BHG vs order event (ok we had never much caps there) I will go on my order fighter/bomber as much other people too. Caps just die to fast against a great number of enemys but agile fighters and bombers have a greater chance to stay alive.
If we would do this everytime (when enough members are online) then we could prevent capspamm cause they would relise that fighting caps with caps isnt the best way.
The RHA as example I have never fight a single RHA cruiser only fighters/bombers and they pwn. They can kill nearly everything and dont need cap support.
If we show the indys teamwork and show them that fighters/bombers can be much better than a cap I think then they would change there caps to fighters and bombers freely.
  Reply  
Offline Tenacity
04-18-2009, 08:18 PM,
#66
Member
Posts: 9,496
Threads: 635
Joined: Apr 2008

' Wrote:in suggestions like these - the term "the others" or "other players" or "you know... those lolwut players" always appear.

you ll hardly ever hear - "lets not fly that ship anymore and i will make the first step and sell mine!"

Well, if someone wants to compensate me the 600 million I've spent on the ship, I might consider it.

Though, tell me, how many players have put as much RP into their ship as I've put into the carrier? Hm?

Personal log files of the character, which towards the last dozen entries mention the construction of the ship, long before 4.85 ever released:
http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=23982

Profile of the character:
http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=33221

Two page description of the ship, it's launch, and how it's being used:
http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?sh...7&hl=Bastet

Most of the idiots around here cant even be bothered to type more than "engaging" before attacking someone, much less put an ounce of thought into how they actually got their ships, how many crew members they have, or what the ship's purpose is other than wtfpwning people.

That's the difference between players like myself, and the "other players" that are being mentioned in this thread.

[Image: Tenacity.gif]
Reply  
Offline Vape
04-18-2009, 10:18 PM,
#67
Member
Posts: 1,543
Threads: 172
Joined: Oct 2007

' Wrote:Order ship capital spam? What has been happening in my inactivity? Swiss & Ten! What have you done?!

Anyway, I can rant on about RP on Order capitals, and nobody would listen.

I propose this:
Any indies that have a capital, I say should be tried as spies/nomads and needs to be expunged.

Harsh, but I love the Order, and don't want its reputation to become that of the average BHG. Cap spammers.

That is all.
Liberty tried that, but look at what happened

[Image: sig2-1-1.png]
  Reply  
Offline Titan
04-18-2009, 10:31 PM,
#68
Member
Posts: 530
Threads: 2
Joined: Jan 2008

The 522nd was created, rampaged OUTSIDE of Liberty for a month, and then promptly failed and got disbanded?

[Image: gebeleizissiggie1copy.png]
Reply  
Offline reavengitair
04-18-2009, 10:51 PM,
#69
Member
Posts: 3,399
Threads: 108
Joined: Dec 2008

*sigh* The only thing I think that ALL light carriers should be on the regostry - currently only mine, swiss's and tena's is even on there.

http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?sh...60&hl=order
  Reply  
Offline Vape
04-18-2009, 11:11 PM,
#70
Member
Posts: 1,543
Threads: 172
Joined: Oct 2007

' Wrote:The 522nd was created, rampaged OUTSIDE of Liberty for a month, and then promptly failed and got disbanded?
Nein

i was referring to the attempted "purge" of oorp Indies

it failed miserably

liberty has more than it did before the purge

[Image: sig2-1-1.png]
  Reply  
Pages (8): « Previous 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode