It was fun... well sorta....

[Karlotta]

Perhaps the person accused didn't break a rule. However we don't discuss sanctions in game or on the forums. They are done in private in order to protect those wrongly accused.

First I was told that the report got lost and was found again. Then I was told Im banned till my report is discussed further. The person I reported admited to at least one of his rule violations in a screenshot I sent, I think the other screenshots were pretty obvsous proof of the other violations. There where santions for other people who did exactly the same thing my screenshots proved. I also gave screenshots where the person says he saw my violation report and wants to stick it in my face (arent they hidden to non-admins?), and another screenshot where he said admins wont take me seriously before I posted about his violations. I posted those screenies in my sanction string afterwards and it got removed by admins. The whole issue started by the person behaving like he is above rules or able to get people sanctioned as he wants.
Do I get at least a pm that the person is 'aquited'? I was told 2 times its on hold. For 10 days. Im not complaining that Im banned during that time becasue I did break rules after him refusing to obey rules for one hour, making me quote them, still ignoring them, and saying he posted a wrong report about me. But why doenst this guy get at least a warning for stuff that is perfectly proven, including posting a lie in a rule violation report about me?
Exactly how does not showing reports and proof 'protect the innoscent'? If you just said straight out, 'We are the people who run this server for free, and thats our friend since 2006 and we allow him to do that, you can leave if you dont like it', there would be less sour grapes. But the way its being handled, it does cause some annoyance.

[Zelot]

First I was told that the report got lost and was found again. Then I was told Im banned till my report is discussed further. The person I reported admited to at least one of his rule violations in a screenshot I sent, I think the other screenshots were pretty obvsous proof of the other violations. There where santions for other people who did exactly the same thing my screenshots proved. I also gave screenshots where the person says he saw my violation report and wants to stick it in my face (arent they hidden to non-admins?), and another screenshot where he said admins wont take me seriously before I posted about his violations. I posted those screenies in my sanction string afterwards and it got removed by admins. The whole issue started by the person behaving like he is above rules or able to get people sanctioned as he wants.
Do I get at least a pm that the person is 'aquited'? I was told 2 times its on hold. For 10 days. Im not complaining that Im banned during that time becasue I did break rules after him refusing to obey rules for one hour, making me quote them, still ignoring them, and saying he posted a wrong report about me. But why doenst this guy get at least a warning for stuff that is perfectly proven, including posting a lie in a rule violation report about me?
Exactly how does not showing reports and proof 'protect the innoscent'? If you just said straight out, 'We are the people who run this server for free, and thats our friend since 2006 and we allow him to do that, you can leave if you dont like it', there would be less sour grapes. But the way its being handled, it does cause some annoyance.

And what does this have in any way to do with the current thread?

---

 

[Karlotta]

Wow... now Zelot is even proud of his being a prick, provoking him on purpose, and then getting him banned when he said f*ck you. Great argument you have with the rule you quoted there. You are truly awesome and someone who should be admired on this server. Try to get more people banned like that. 2700 posts! Woo hoo!

[n00bl3t]

And what does this have in any way to do with the current thread?

Noted. (I wish I had this from you a year ago, when your only contribution to this community was spamming threads made by Akumabito.)

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[Zelot]

Wow... now Zelot is even proud of his being a prick, provoking him on purpose, and then getting him banned when he said f*ck you. Great argument you have with the rule you quoted there. You are truly awesome and someone who should be admired on this server. Try to get more other people banned.

How did I provoke him? I did nothing to provoke him, uness you consider an FA ship stopping an Ageria or IC ship provoking. The fact that these players were content on just ignoring me and moving on like I was not even there was why I switched and used another also legal tactic. How is that being a prick huh?


The two incedents took place a day apart and had nothing to do with each other.



I love when people who dont know me or have ever interacted with me make statements about my motives and reasons.

---

 

[Karlotta]

And what does this have in any way to do with the current thread?

This is a 'rule lawyers' suck thread.

[Fellow Hoodlum]

And as usual, nothing can be conducted here with any civility ... It's a game guys, and if you do not like the
rules, you ALL have other choices, and that means ALL OF YOU.
As to the theories n00blet, and all eloquence aside, your bias always implies conspiracy ...
If the tin foil cap fits, feel free to wear it please.

Hoodlum

---

Some say he is a proud member of: "The most paranoid group of people in the Community."