• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion Discovery Mod Balance
« Previous 1 … 39 40 41 42 43 … 55 Next »
Enough nerfing - give us back some decent ships

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (13): « Previous 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 13 Next »
Thread Closed 
Enough nerfing - give us back some decent ships
Offline airage
08-24-2009, 02:52 PM,
#61
Member
Posts: 99
Threads: 12
Joined: Feb 2008

' Wrote:then riddle me this: how would you like if it were the other way around?

please keep it constructive and hold I-hate-all-bhg grudges out of this thread please.

You're very wrong my friend, I dont have anything against bh, I know many of members there and Im ok with them, Im nearly trying to be constructive and say my opinion. I dont think mod balance should be done only by raw specs of ship, theres much more to look at.

[Image: ordersiggeh.jpg]-
 
Offline globalplayer-svk
08-24-2009, 03:03 PM,
#62
Member
Posts: 1,526
Threads: 45
Joined: Sep 2007

can players of the official BH factions give someone their words, that they will hold cap whoring inside limits?...
i think no.
and you are still asking to have better and better cap ships? why noone from you complained how weak was titan against your ships before? why noone from you complained about bh gunship before?

and i will know, for what you need to have the best cap ships?
in rp, corsairs are one of the best shipbuilders in sirius, but you still will have better caps as them.
in rp order use the most advantage technology from humans in sirius, but you still will have better cap ships as them.
any logic in that?

and all here scream about cap ships. ok, have better caps, and drop bomber stats for example. then you will see that caps are not key...
cap ships are the most usseles ships in game. group of 4 bombers can make you know what...
or you need again keepers in bombers to understand that?


[Image: vladsignature.png]
 
Offline MarvinCZ
08-24-2009, 03:33 PM, (This post was last modified: 08-24-2009, 03:34 PM by MarvinCZ.)
#63
Member
Posts: 1,312
Threads: 12
Joined: May 2008

' Wrote:I don't have Datastorm installed on my comp anymore nor do I remember the size of the gs's power plant. If I recall correctly, it's the smallest one available, which makes sense. I have a hunch that if you go all Solaris turrets, or get all carried away with missile turrets, you'll have serious power management issues. It would have to be tested. Five forward firing turrets would be a decent compromise, because four is real anemic.

The BH GS is an excellent ship, but very inflexible. It deserves a little more flexibility, without making it into an unbalanced nightmare. If anything, nix the Orca (big ol' SNAC magnet) in order to justify making the gs a tad more flexible. Thanks for the translation - I was tired and was having trouble parsing his syntax. If he wanted to brag, he could have used a clearer expression.
Any GB will have power management issues if you get carried away with missiles.

Gunboats should not be too all-round, and that goes for the GS even more - it should be specialised against fighters/bombers. The 4 slots are enough to get a loadout very effective against them. For example 1 missile + 3 Solaris/normal guns. Alternatively you can get a few razors if you trust in your aim and remain quite effective against caps at the same time. I use missile+BHG guns with razors on my rear slots - It can be used against caps with some extra maneuvering.
The fact that other GBs can be all-round is a thing to change, not mimic.
 
Offline Asgardian
08-24-2009, 03:46 PM,
#64
Member
Posts: 1,053
Threads: 73
Joined: Aug 2008

' Wrote:can players of the official BH factions give someone their words, that they will hold cap whoring inside limits?...
i think no.
Pot calling the kettle black here. But I wont get started on that.
' Wrote:and you are still asking to have better and better cap ships? why noone from you complained how weak was titan against your ships before? why noone from you complained about bh gunship before?

and i will know, for what you need to have the best cap ships?
in rp, corsairs are one of the best shipbuilders in sirius, but you still will have better caps as them.
in rp order use the most advantage technology from humans in sirius, but you still will have better cap ships as them.
any logic in that?

and all here scream about cap ships. ok, have better caps, and drop bomber stats for example. then you will see that caps are not key...
cap ships are the most usseles ships in game. group of 4 bombers can make you know what...
or you need again keepers in bombers to understand that?
We don't want the absolute best capital ships in the game, just "de-nerf" them a bit. Perhaps a better-looking Mako as well:P

[Image: sigfinalresize.png]
Liberty Navy
Faction Status || Message Dump || Capital Ship Registration || Recruitment || Laws of the Republic of Liberty
Liberty Criminal Database || Liberty Criminal Registry || Ship Database || Trade Embargo
 
Offline Dashiell
08-24-2009, 04:08 PM,
#65
Member
Posts: 2,973
Threads: 148
Joined: Oct 2008

if that bloody hitbox wasn`t so hell bent on being stubbornly buggy, it would at least make some difference. but aye, maybe a new ship is a better idea? make it a "heavy" BS or "baby" dreadnought or something

kinda like the 4.85 beta one, only with a tad different looks and an all new hitbox that (hopefully) won`t cause as much grief.

[Image: serpentlol.gif]
Offline n1kodemus
08-24-2009, 04:25 PM,
#66
Member
Posts: 394
Threads: 17
Joined: Apr 2009

' Wrote:Perhaps a better-looking Mako as well:P

The Mako looks awesome. End of discussion.
Offline schlurbi
08-24-2009, 05:36 PM,
#67
Member
Posts: 4,688
Threads: 187
Joined: Apr 2009

I see only Gunships. And really dont make them Stronger.

"Who is it doing this synthetic type of alpha beta psychedelic funkin'?"
[Image: Newgoldensigfinishawesomecoolcolours.png]
 
Offline Red_Bull
08-24-2009, 05:42 PM,
#68
Member
Posts: 296
Threads: 12
Joined: Jul 2009

The BHBS is already more powerfull then the Osiris, and you want to give it more power? That would mean they would have to up the Order ships to.

[Image: usflag.gif]
 
Offline globalplayer-svk
08-24-2009, 05:59 PM,
#69
Member
Posts: 1,526
Threads: 45
Joined: Sep 2007

' Wrote:We don't want the absolute best capital ships in the game, just "de-nerf" them a bit. Perhaps a better-looking Mako as well:P

then why is majority of this and similar threads in line with: corsair legate is stronger, order carrier can beat our battlecruiser and so?

i wish, that dev team remove the mako, and give you dread, as corsairs have.but with similar size.
and then i will burn your scream how is that ship slow turning, how easy is that ship destroyable by 2 bombers and useless in stone fields in gamma and minor in the highest flames...

and sorry, you will best caps in the game...

[Image: vladsignature.png]
 
Offline Tenacity
08-24-2009, 06:02 PM,
#70
Member
Posts: 9,496
Threads: 635
Joined: Apr 2008

Whoever it was that said any cruiser can take on the BHBC... you're an idiot. The BHBC has more armor, more forward firing guns, and twice the power core of just about any cruiser in the mod.

Any cruiser pilot that takes out a battlecruiser 1v1 is either godly, or is fighting an absolutely terrible BC pilot. The only exception I can think of would be the kusari destroyer, but everyone knows that thing is overpowered anyway.

As far as I'm concerned, the only buffs the BHG ships need right now is a fixed hitbox or new model for the mako, but keep in mind it's still going to be larger than the osiris - it isnt a light battleship.

[Image: Tenacity.gif]
Pages (13): « Previous 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 13 Next »
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode