• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion Discovery Mod Balance
« Previous 1 … 38 39 40 41 42 … 55 Next »
Another conceptual thought for bombers

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3
Another conceptual thought for bombers
Offline Divine
09-13-2009, 02:02 PM,
#21
Probation
Posts: 1,480
Threads: 40
Joined: Jul 2008

' Wrote:...
First of all, give bombers a big shield. Something like 100k, but with the caveat that it was of a different variety than every other type of fighter shield. And only bombers could equip it.
...
Thoughts?

Why not just give also the 'smaller', right now more agile bombers all a shield like the Barghest/Thor (read 'huge' bombers') have.
That would be a boost for those ships while maintaining their current agility as it is.
For that maybe boost HF/VHF guns in their speed up to 900 (1000 seems here a bit much to me).

Bc, if you want to give those Bombers a 100k shield, you would need to make them massivly less agile, to prevent even more bomberspam. Lunaphase mentioned it, a current 'smaller' bomber with a 100k shield would more as be 'uber', not to mention the whole balance-issue it creates.

-- -- --

' Wrote:Bad Idea.

Like I continue to say, what we need to do is:

-Remove the SNAC
-Add additional torpedoes each with it's own use, different damage types, blast ranges, etc.
-Remove all gun hardpoints from bombers, and give each bomber 3-4 missile hardpoints plus a CD hardpoint
-Buff Fighter guns to 1000m/s speed.

1. "You shall not question the holy SNAC!"
2. Good idea, that has my full support. More different Torpedos would be really nice, i can imagine a EMP version like we got it for the mine types fe.
3. Ahem, 'Missilespam' ? If you want to go with the idea of removing the gunslots from bombers, why not add more torpedo slots instead of missile ones?
4. See above quote-answering please.

-- -- --

my $0.02

- Div.

User was banned for: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=151485
Time left: (Permanent)
  Reply  
Offline Rommie
09-13-2009, 02:43 PM,
#22
Member
Posts: 1,585
Threads: 46
Joined: Mar 2009

I still do not understand why people keep complaining about changing the bombers.That aside, your 100k shield ideea would give balancing headaches.

In space, nobody knows I'm a panda
Reply  
Offline Grimly
09-13-2009, 03:28 PM,
#23
Member
Posts: 1,059
Threads: 82
Joined: May 2008

' Wrote:I still do not understand why people keep complaining about changing the bombers.That aside, your 100k shield ideea would give balancing headaches.
cuz olol I got pwned by lolzorkevin14YOallmahteeth with a SNAC

I don't know who was the mandolarian BHG bomber yesterday on KNF/BAF event, I'm not sure he lasted really long. Ask him:)

[Image: signature2b.png]
Taking what's yours since 816 A.S.
  Reply  
Camtheman Of Freelancer4Ever
09-13-2009, 06:38 PM,
#24
Unregistered
 

Nighthawk, Please check the solaris range, and then SNAC range, and then get back to me.
Reply  
Offline pruskis92
09-13-2009, 08:47 PM,
#25
Member
Posts: 363
Threads: 12
Joined: Jul 2008

' Wrote:cuz olol I got pwned by lolzorkevin14YOallmahteeth with a SNAC

I don't know who was the mandolarian BHG bomber yesterday on KNF/BAF event, I'm not sure he lasted really long. Ask him:)

Ha, indeed... When BAF killed more than half of KNF and CR, I noticed, that there was one MM BH bomber, I called grimly and it was down in two minutes.

BOMBERS ARE FINE AS THEY ARE! And stop making dumb threads about it every day!

* Feedback || Recruitment || Message dump || Privateers's Recruitment || Wiki *
[Image: theblacksails_signature_cristmas_edition.png]
"we bring disaster 'we bring fun times and a cheery mood in december' [Image: ye.png][Image: ye.png][Image: np.png]"
Reply  
Offline tansytansey
09-13-2009, 08:55 PM,
#26
Member
Posts: 4,099
Threads: 67
Joined: Aug 2008

' Wrote:Nighthawk, Please check the solaris range, and then SNAC range, and then get back to me.
Well duh. But it's not always possible to hit a Kusari Dessie or Liberty Siege Cruiser from 2k range when they have a half-decent pilot who doesn't sit still and try to pew pew you. Ships like that you have to get up-close and personal to blow the crap out of. Not to mention Gunboats, you won't have a chance in hell of hitting those from outside their gun range.

http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/vv46/Ni...gcloudscopy.png
Image turned into a URL because it made your sig too tall. -Zuke
|Ashes and Draya's Epic Adventure|Ashes "Nighthawk" Yotaka|Nightfall|Eva Jones|
[5:50:49 PM] JakeSG (William Darkmoor) says: I like you, Ashes. You're more cynical than God.
[Image: SLRU.png]
  Reply  
Offline VenomHX
09-14-2009, 02:54 AM,
#27
Member
Posts: 181
Threads: 19
Joined: Sep 2009

' Wrote:No offense, but you should have stopped at, "Greetings discovery!" After that, you are no longer safe from flame.

No kidding. There should be a forum dubbed ''Flamery''. Maybe people will get it out of there systems there and be more productive in the rest of the forum.

This after a few comments posted at me and pm'ed towards me -

Chill out people, it's just a game. And if you were that high and mighty you wouldn't be sitting here playing a game you'd be doing something better with your life than sitting here making personal shanks in someone's side.

"Abstinence of the Heart; Sever Your Emotion Like A Defective Circuit..."

http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=27830 - Please watch what you post here, please.
Signature gnome attack!

  Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode