What's going on with HF?

[TankTarget]

Yeah Dab did that and he brought it up fine...I have no comment about those posts...

I just wanna know why all the crap flying at HF? Hmmm? Dab may have done some things in the past but so what grow up and move on. Ignore him and don't bring him up and his banter goes away.

But yeah explain...what is your guy's problem with HF? I am really interested in what we/I have done to deserve to openly flamed and accused of violating RP openly in forums without any proof whatsoever.

I just wanna know what the deal is...just tell me flat out. Either here, forums, skype, xfire or hell ingame. I just wanna know. I will defend my friends and members of my factions to the extent of getting banned to keep HF's good name alive and those who are in it. If you wanna bring HF into this petty squabble you all have then give me a damned reason for it all...

[Korrd]

I've split this from the thread where it was to avoid more off topic and flames.

Keep this thread flame/hate/proud-free and i will leave it be.
begin flame/hate/proud-ing, and I will begin slaughtering people, and close the thread.

---

Server Status | Server Rules | Players Online | Player Rankings | Freelancer Account Manager

(If you find any mistake in my English, please let me know via a PM)
(Really, I speak terrible English, so please, tell me if I make mistakes. I'd like to improve it a bit )

[bluntpencil2001]

HF are mostly cool.

I'm still going to use them for target practice though:P

---

[Spacewolf]

As long as they keep paying me to kill you:P

[TankTarget]

You are just annoying Blunt:)not someone insulting and bashing me and my faction. If someone wants to bash me that is fine. I will defend myself and deal with it... When someone goes after my people, my friends and members of HF... Just don't if there is a problem keep it between me and yourself. Should anyone else openly bash HF, I guess something bad may happen. I just will not sit around while people accuse my members of horrid things and make them out to be villains... I simply won't

[bluntpencil2001]

Yeah, it annoys me when people take offence to in-character conflicts.

Keep the fighting in-game is what I say!

---

[Ant]

Only problem I have with HF is the OOC in system chat, especially when it's about apparent rule violations when there is no such rule. HF aren't the only offenders of course.

Please point out the section of the rules that states someone may not use cruise during combat.
Even if it were listed in the rules, there is no reason to comment on it in system chat.
If you want a rule added about shield running, start a forum discussion about what constitutes shield running and have a vote about getting such a rule introduced.

Regarding RP, while it might seem strange HF were parked in Vespucci for 10-15 minutes and jumped into Magellan the moment SA arrived near the jumphole, I don't really have a problem with it.
Your RP is your business. It was rather a nice ambush I thought.
I was a little disappointed my superiors in SCRA stuck around to be the meat in the sandwich. It could have been a much more even battle if they'd gone to cruise and fought it out in the asteroid fields.

[TankTarget]

Well...HF was not the party saying that. That was Korrd. And the rule in cruise is cruise and don't come back is all.

And as for the thing with the SA. We saw you coming hunkered down waiting anticipating another attack on Vespucci like previously. SA must've seen it, after all you did go through California. It surprised me they didn't jump you when you went through...

[Denelo]

Only problem I have with HF is the OOC in system chat, especially when it's about apparent rule violations when there is no such rule. HF aren't the only offenders of course.

... WHAT?! If ANY HF EVER DO OOC IN SYSTEM CHAT, PLEASE TELL ME. I need some names here. As far as I'm aware HF DO NOT EVER speak in ooc in system chat (without ooc:, //, (), {}, or [] of course... and even then only rarely)

Please point out the section of the rules that states someone may not use cruise during combat.
Even if it were listed in the rules, there is no reason to comment on it in system chat.

that was probably a mistake... we have several new players on our roster, and he probably was thinking of the Criuse + EK rule. But that would be shield running anyways... big nono.

If you want a rule added about shield running, start a forum discussion about what constitutes shield running and have a vote about getting such a rule introduced.

Never said we did.

Regarding RP, while it might seem strange HF were parked in Vespucci for 10-15 minutes and jumped into Magellan the moment SA arrived near the jumphole, I don't really have a problem with it.
Your RP is your business. It was rather a nice ambush I thought.

I don't know anything about that, wasn't there, but I suspect it was because SCRA arrived at that time.

I was a little disappointed my superiors in SCRA stuck around to be the meat in the sandwich. It could have been a much more even battle if they'd gone to cruise and fought it out in the asteroid fields.

Well, that's not HF's problem.

[Ant]

Well...HF was not the party saying that. That was Korrd. And the rule in cruise is cruise and don't come back is all.

And as for the thing with the SA. We saw you coming hunkered down waiting anticipating another attack on Vespucci like previously. SA must've seen it, after all you did go through California. It surprised me they didn't jump you when you went through...

It was an HF char who was first to mention shield-running I believe, although I missed getting a screenshot of it.

Once again, can you point out the section of the rules that says anything about shield running?
Is there any reason to mention it in system chat anyway?