' Wrote:You'd guys would be surprised how many characters I have had and played under a different account and IP.
You guys just connect the name Saronsen with whatever ship you know is mine, and refuse to roleplay.
Ever wonder why I have one character meant explicitly to infuriate yours? Ever wonder why I act the way I do on the forums?
I have more accounts, both forum and server, that you will never pick out as me, and I can tell you i've interacted with almost every well known person here for quite a bit of time. And you were quite nice to me too, when you didn't know it was me.
But this isn't a Saronsen feedback thread.
Also as Joe said, im the victim here qq
Saronsen owwwtttt.
Learn to read, there's a reason why I wrote Saronsens (The characters), of course I don't know all your characters, and I'm pretty sure I've played with some of them, still, that doesn't make a difference when I referred to Saronsens. Your saronsens are annoying, not even fun in a gah gah way, not fun at all, every interaction with them (when you didn't end yelling and complaining through PM's, your dark past... past right?) were annoying, the way you play them is annoying, and you demand Joe to play forced with them, just because he's an admin? Doesn't make any sense.
Quote:Ever wonder why I have one character meant explicitly to infuriate yours? Ever wonder why I act the way I do on the forums?
No, I don't know. I didn't know you have one character meant explicitly to infuriate people, if you ask me, what a waste of time, what a bad taste, and shame on you, if I pissed off people ingame, wasn't in purpose, I find that of bad taste, and horrible to do it on purpose.
And I really doubt you created Saronsen, and you started acting in forun in the way you acted just to infuriate a few [LN]s, don't try to use the [LN] as an excuse for your previous behavior, and for sure, you shouldn't be reminding people of your previous behavior either.
I like it and even though I am not involved in any way in these screens, I think it would be appropriate to edit the images and hide the names of the people who "complained"
I thought about that too, but decided not to. Sometimes people don't recognise what they've said or done unless you give them an example with their name on it. From my own experience, I haven't recognised my own actions in the past unless more than one person has said "yes, you did that".
It has to be said that both of these examples are used as just that, and it is not just them. Such complaints are a common occurrence. Plus, it sometimes helps to name those who do something a little rash, as it can help to alleviate a repeat performance in the future.
Quote:Today, I came across two examples of what not to feedback about.
I appreciate the reasoning expressed in your post, and the civility of your tone, McNeo. However, it is up to Admins and Moderators to determine what is inappropriate faction feedback.
' Wrote:I appreciate the reasoning expressed in your post, and the civility of your tone, McNeo. However, it is up to Admins and Moderators to determine what is inappropriate faction feedback.
Post invised.
Good job I saved the post then. Besides, I do not believe your statement is correct as faction leaders can have their feedback shut down if they determine that the feedback they're receiving is inappropriate.
If the second in command of a faction can't even post in their feedback thread showing people what inappropriate feedback is, then what exactly is the point in these threads except to attract grief and be a place to vent frustration?
Faction leaders can request that their feedback threads be locked down. It is up to the Admins, and or, Moderators to determine if such action is necessary.
Signature violates 1.7, please resize:
1.7 - Pictures that exceed 700px width or signatures that exceed 700*250px*3 MB are not allowed on the forum.
Mephistoles
If factions got to determine what feedback they receive, it would be little more than a state run media. Faction leaders, as of now, do not have moderator powers for their faction feedback threads.