>you need to make a second demand beofre the trader explodes provided he's met the first demand.
Wait a second... Rule is saying only about issuing a demand and the time to response, it doesnt say anything about complying or not. And i remember it was said by some admin somewhere about like 2 months ago that blowing trader up after he paid is not violating the rules but it still can be considered as 0.0 violation.
Vlad we treat it as PvP abuse, if the trader meets the demand and gets blown up anyway, no trader will ever pay. After all what's the point in paying if you die anyway? May as well just skip to the dying. That's not promoting RP, it's promoting PvP. And whilst PvP is an integral part of the server we will always try to promote RP over PvP
Cometa I would suggest the pirate was mistaken rather than being a douche.
Saint Del is considered a holy healer of diseases of children, but also as a protector of cattle.
' Wrote:>you need to make a second demand beofre the trader explodes provided he's met the first demand.
Wait a second... Rule is saying only about issuing a demand and the time to response, it doesnt say anything about complying or not. And i remember it was said by some admin somewhere about like 2 months ago that blowing trader up after he paid is not violating the rules but it still can be considered as 0.0 violation.
I think the phrase "That was then, this is now," might apply in this situation. Once upon a time, I could throw battleship turrets on a Luxury Liner.
>I think the phrase "That was then, this is now," might apply in this situation. Once upon a time, I could throw battleship turrets on a Luxury Liner.
No, not really. I mean, rules weren't changed.
>Vlad we treat it as PvP abuse, if the trader meets the demand and gets blown up anyway, no trader will ever pay. After all what's the point in paying if you die anyway? May as well just skip to the dying. That's not promoting RP, it's promoting PvP. And whilst PvP is an integral part of the server we will always try to promote RP over PvP
So yeah, its 0.0 unless there is a RP reason behind it, and second demand doesnt need to be issued. Thanks for clarification. It's not like i'm planning to do something this but better safe than sorry in case there will be a need for it.
Cometa, the pirate probably thought that you had paid the freelancer to kill the pirate, while you get away. A perfectly legit opinion IMO (i've done it and had it done to me) and while from your perspective, it's a douche move, from his it's perfectly logical.
' Wrote:Here's the scenario (exactly as it is in my printscreens chat history)
Rogue: I need to ask 3 million form you
Me: Right
Rogue: Pay up, lets go
*paid*
Rogue: Good
Then I do not know what happened...
*Rogue attacked me*
Me: Why are you shooting me?
*Freelancer attacked Rogue*
Freelancer: STOP SHOOTING!
Rogue: Seeing you attacked me
Freelancer: Judge comming (?)
Me: me?
Me: you are crazy
Me: I paid you
Freelancer: engage rogue!
*Death: Me was put out of action by Rogue (Missile/Torpedo)*
*Death: Rogue was put out of action by Freelancer (Gun)*
Okay, for the record this was me. You paid me and I said you may go. But I than asked your buddy to pay as well, he attacked. I thought you attacked as well because there was shoots coming from your direction.
I am sorry That I killed you, it was a fault that I was not paying close enough attention when this happened. If you like I will reimburse for your lost cargo.
And once again, I am very sorry for this mis understanding when the event occurred.
' Wrote:Cometa, the pirate probably thought that you had paid the freelancer to kill the pirate, while you get away. A perfectly legit opinion IMO (i've done it and had it done to me) and while from your perspective, it's a douche move, from his it's perfectly logical.
If I had paid the freelancer, I had not paid the pirate. This is also logical.
-
A.Ocampo, I'm glad you answered me personally.
You do not have to pay me anything, I think your apologize serve as reimbursement.