Test server showing the new Leopard is slightly lacking. Mainly in DPM (compared to the T-62a; RUS CONSPIRACY).
Luckily the majority of feedback is saying this, so it has a reasonable chance of being addressed.
(04-11-2013, 02:07 AM)Crackpunch Wrote: Test server showing the new Leopard is slightly lacking. Mainly in DPM (compared to the T-62a; RUS CONSPIRACY).
Luckily the majority of feedback is saying this, so it has a reasonable chance of being addressed.
I feel like its slightly more maneuverable than the T-62a. The accuracy is godlike as well.
If that really makes up for its 1.5 rounds per 2 the T-62a can fire its hard to say. But I've never had an issue fighting the T-62a.
(04-11-2013, 03:20 AM)Gentlefood Wrote: I feel like its slightly more maneuverable than the T-62a. The accuracy is godlike as well.
If that really makes up for its 1.5 rounds per 2 the T-62a can fire its hard to say. But I've never had an issue fighting the T-62a.
But what about armour and profile? I'm guessing the T-62a is better in both respects?
The Leo 1 is slightly taller, and has about the same length and width, but has much better Gun depression. Armor is non-existent on the Leo, but your mantle can absorb and bounce some shots. Neither tank can take a shot to the side and the extra gun depression allows the Leo 1 to shoot down on the vulnerable hull armor of the T-62a.