Zoner ID Reformation Idea

[n00bl3t]

--

Addendum for n00bl3t: I daresay my assessment of the TAZ was premature. Given that at the time we'd been discussing it for a couple days and Yaoquizque was the only one to offer sentiments from the TAZ which went uncontradicted until yesterday, I assumed his comments represented the greater part of his faction. As I came to know later, that was not the case.

[6/30/2011 10:39:36 PM] Tristan - TAZ Representative: Oh and the reason that there are no TAZ viewpoints is that well, frankly I dont have issue with much of what is in the proposal. All I care about is if it would work for all of us and not just TAZ.

You need not play coy, however. You know exactly what I'm talking about in regards to infighting. You asked me to show respect toward your faction in the things I say on the forum - and I have with this thread been positively delightful - but I'd most certainly like to ask the same of you. This thread is not about airing our grievances about each other's players, it's about discussing and possibly eventually finding a solution to the ID issue that none of us thought about since we're so mired in the issues. As you've been so polite to remind me, we have feedback threads for this.

Fair enough, I do not speak with Tristan or Yaoquizque so I would not know.

I do know, but I seriously thought there was no infighting with the proposal, so it caught me off guard.

Either way, I do not support the ID change. The Zoner and Zoner Guard ID should remain as is.

Having said that, I would fully support OSI-'s application for another ID. I am not saying you should become Freelancers or whatever else is being said, I am talking about a custom OSI- ID. (For which you define your own RP parameters with the developers and the Administrators.)

My only concern, or caution with this would be asking you not to use capital ships. Fearless and Juggernaut specifically, because the Conference makes RP sense as an escorting ship and the Corvo is quite open. I do see your role-play as more corporation-based, so I would not see the need for you to use this. (I believe I talked with someone who said you have no Fearlesses or Juggernauts anyway, so I do not think you mind. Please clarify if this is the case.)

Also, my apologies if this has been brought up before. I only read Gheis's response and responded because I was not interested in the flood of certain posts that I am sure I will find if I go through all the pages.

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.