Since you seem to have this big stickler for what happened with Sina's Ghost.Reaver account, yet you never actually asked or researched anything about it, I will clarify it.
The following is a quote by myself in the very rule violation report you submitted concerning his posting during his ban. Quotes of others' posts will not be included here, unless they do so themselves. However, I think it's worth you noticing how you've been arguing a point that doesn't exist. That being that we did nothing against him for violating his ban.
Quote:Sina has 18 days, (19 from your post's date), not 2 (3). He was banned for 14 days, then restricted to RP sections for 30 days after that 14 day ban was complete, not 30 days from the start. The ban started on February 23rd. 14 days later was March 9th, so he is restricted to the RP section until April 8th, another 18 days from now.
That said, I don't really see anything wrong with him posting in the linked thread, considering the subject matter does impact his gameplay, and that his post there was on-topic and in the rules.
Though, that said, DI isn't doing anything wrong reporting someone who is posting and shouldn't be, even if this case isn't really bad. Yes, they both hate each other. It does not invalidate this report though.
I wouldn't see anything wrong here with Sina's conduct except that it is not the only non-RP section post he has made during his RP section ban. [link removed]Ghost Reaver post history. He has posted outside of the roleplaying section 5 times so far (1 having been edited after-the-fact). This is not counting the rule section post which I don't see anything wrong with. So yes, Sina is in violation of the terms of his ban.
Dusty shouldn't have lied in the thread, he knows better.
The only off-topic post from DI that I found in the thread was the one commenting on Sina's ban not being up, but him posting.
I don't see anything wrong here with DI, but Sina is clearly in violation of his forum ban, and Dusty was lying to make it seem like he wasn't to others (unless he was making a very bad joke, that shouldn't have been done either).
Valid report in my opinion.
The thread referred to here where Sina had posted was a rule amendment post where Sina posted concerning the affect of that change in the rules. He was banned from the forums, not the server, and we appreciate any opinions of those affected by the rule changes the admins impose. However, the problem arose when he had posted outside of the rule section, in clear violation of the terms of his ban.