(11-13-2012, 07:27 PM)Tutashkha Wrote: that is just foolish. I don't believe in it.
The same thing should have happened in 2000,but as we see we're still alive.
y2k was a forseen technical bug caused by a terrible lack of foresight by those who wrote financial and banking programs in the seventies and eighties. They didn't think anyone would be using their systems that far in the future so they neglected to add the first two digits to a year to save what at that time would have been a considerable amount of space. Needless to say come 00 it would have wreacked considerable havoc on our financial system.
However, in the early ninties they realized the problem and an entire industry rose up overnight to combat the problem by (i kid you not) manually editing all the programs and database entries in programs incompatible with a four digit date.
If you've ever watched the movie "Office Space" that's actually the job the protagonist has.
(11-14-2012, 03:49 PM)sajjukar Wrote: No am am not refering to the Maya callendar and i put "end of the world" in " " " for a reason.
It is belived by our scientific comunity that our solar sistem orbits another star much bigger than our own but considerable further than the north star so it cannot be seen by the naked eye.It is speculated that we are very near the end of a solar cicle and we are enetring the so called "golden zone" where we receve much more solar radiation from that star....hope all of you are familiar with the matter/wave behaviour of a photon particle and its effects on live matter or even static matter.
For those who dont know,photons "live" in a dual state:
1.A photon is a mesuarable particle with mass...so its matter
2.A photon behaves as a wave (eg: radio wave) so it cannot be 100% matter
It is theorised and recently put to practice that a photons can "move" objects but very little...so little that it is simply a variable witch cannot be brought into the discussion BUT it has this ability...also a photon when it enters in contact with matter (photon bombardement) it transfers the energy it stored into that object,person,stuff.
A interesting thing that i found its called the "photon belt" or something witch tells us that when we will enter close proximity with our parent star we will receve much more radiation ("energy").
This is what i was refering too and was hopefull that some of you ahve heard of it and hoping to have a little exchange of ideas on this theme.
Ps:Not from home pc so any any links that i would love to share are close to imposible to find because i didnt memorised theyr title and lack any usefull bookmarks.
Edit: I was not curing with the ******** ... that simply a word that describes a bulls fecal matter
Please don't quote us .net pages with black backgrounds and 20 fonts a page.
As for your theories......
Except during localized solar weather events i.e solar flares a sun by it's very nature puts out an equal amount of radiation in all directions.
Furthermore any star invisible to the naked eye would be almost assuredly too far away to impact the earth with any radiation short of going supernova.
What our sun (and the rest of the Milky Way) does actually orbit around is the Galactic Center, which has long been believed and was only recently "confirmed" (in air quotes beacuse this is science and we are frequently wrong) by the Max Planck Institute to be a supermassive black hole.
I'm not even going to comment on the rest of what you are saying, beacuse you are so wrong it's not funny.
It sounds like a chinese whispers version of the fears of a second Carrington event and the possible increase in solar activity (within our own star, thank you much).
gone four years, first day back: Zoners still getting shot in Theta :|