(02-06-2013, 07:25 AM)Hero4Hire Wrote: Here's what I saw:
You mean here's what you claim.
(02-06-2013, 07:25 AM)Hero4Hire Wrote: The guy wasnt blocking anything. Any ship could have easily docked or launched, without problems.
My Transport was having difficulty trying to dock with the mooring point thanks to this vessel being in the way.
(02-06-2013, 07:25 AM)Hero4Hire Wrote: The ship he allegedly rammed into actually rammed into him, and it could have very easily avoided it.
I missed this, but this wouldn't have been an issue if he hadn't been sitting right at the mooring/docking point. You know, blocking things like the LPI- said he was.
(02-06-2013, 07:25 AM)Hero4Hire Wrote: The LPI lied about both thing in front of other people, to justify the 10 million credit fine.
How exactly were they lying? I had trouble with him being in my way, and it was obvious that his vessel knocked the other pilot into the planet. The death message told as much.
(02-06-2013, 07:25 AM)Hero4Hire Wrote: The LPI basically used it as an excuse to pirate and humiliate him in front of others.
They fined him. And given his horrendous attitude and terrible behavior, rightfully so.
(02-06-2013, 07:25 AM)Hero4Hire Wrote: The LPI called an official LN on skype to get the guy to pay although he had nothing wrong.
Wrong on both accounts. I was already there(I merely switched vessels) and we've established that he was behaving inappropriately.
(02-06-2013, 07:25 AM)Hero4Hire Wrote: They killed me although I have broken exactly 0 laws, and a legal setup, because I contradicted their story.
You were told a dozen plus times to leave the crime scene and to stop interferring with an ongoing investigation. You continued to spout your misinterpretations, and we silenced you after more than your fair share of warnings were issued.
(02-06-2013, 07:25 AM)Hero4Hire Wrote: THey left him under the impression that he had to obey the official guy, although following the server rules, he did not in this situation.
Primary fleets do have both the authority to command and the requirement to set an example on the server. It's part of the rules. What part of the proper command channel do you have a problem with?
(02-06-2013, 07:25 AM)Hero4Hire Wrote: The LPI and associates LSF/LNS/[LN] ships shot him although he payed the fine, "by accident".
Actually, we left him alone for several hours even though he appeared to have disrupted some lanes. It was well after this fine was complete that he shot at an indy LN Gunboat, restarting the whole affair. And then he opened fire on LPI- with his mortars, so we took him out. Your ignorance on this matter is telling.
(02-06-2013, 07:25 AM)Hero4Hire Wrote: When he left to Colorado, they follow him there, and more shooting followed.
We'd actually left to Colorado to deal with a Gallic Junker who was pirating over planet Denver. Several of us pursued and engaged the Gallic and destroyed him in Kepler. While we were returning we saw a death message that an LSF Indy Cap had been destroyed by Black Scorpion at planet Denver. We also received a comm from the LPI- on duty that he was being attacked, again, by Black Scorpion, so we responsed and dusted him, again.
(02-06-2013, 07:25 AM)Hero4Hire Wrote: After he died in Colorado they also followed him to California where the next shoot out was about to start, until I very thuroughly explained to the non LPI guys who just believed the LPI's word that the LPI hd in fact been lying to get 10 million credits.
While I'd left by this time, it was quite apparent that Black Scorpion was going to continue attacking the Liberty Forces present in every system anyway. You can check his own words below.
(02-06-2013, 07:25 AM)Hero4Hire Wrote: Yes, now you have your nice forum posts and screenies and "testimonies" by all your people who say the same thing.
But I think there are some details that kind of failed to shed light on the ENTIRE "context".
You're the one without "context" here. And generally, if we all have photo evidence and we all say the same things(backed up by the photo evidence), chances are we have the correct context on the matter.