I'll ask for a little clarification on this then, if I may. What are we supposed to do about a target using no IFF? Is using a ship without IFF a free ticket out of being hunted for bounty contracts? Because quite a bit of the evidence shown was of us shooting players with no IFF.
As for the rest of the infractions, I don't feel like we were harming gameplay or getting any kind of advantage by being neutral to BHG, so the fact that the initial decision was bastille for an indefinite time seems a little over the top.
It also seems a little odd that the attacking party should be the one responsible for making sure that enemy bases shoot them, and not the other way around.
Oh, and do we get the bonus of you guys fixing our rep's for us like these guys did?
(08-10-2013, 12:03 PM)Loken Wrote:
(08-09-2013, 04:04 PM)Hasteric Wrote: (as Outcasts have been rephacked red to the ID for longer than Bubbles has been a Reaver)
Yes, really. That player had no IFF, if I remember correctly, so there's not a lot we can do about being hostile.
(08-10-2013, 12:03 PM)Loken Wrote: I'll send a PM will all the evidence to Haste. Some of it might not be correct but the vast majority of it should apply.
Edit: So after personally reviewing the evidence there are still some examples where reps are wrong but the majority are inconclusive or completely irrelevant. The warning still stands that you need to watch your reputations more closely.
The ships will be released from Bastille within the next day or so.
So... Did the team just not actually look at the evidence properly the first time around? That's kind of worrying.