• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 84 85 86 87 88 … 546 Next »
Ship-based technerf thread one billion

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Gallic Royal Navy Forces - 83 / 10,000
Gallic Royal Navy Forces - 107 / 10,000
Liberty-Bretonia Combined Fleet - 33 / 10,000
Liberty-Bretonia Combined Fleet - 38 / 10,000

Latest activity

Ship-based technerf thread one billion
Offline Adam_Spire
07-19-2015, 01:15 PM,
#29
Member
Posts: 1,226
Threads: 219
Joined: Aug 2009

(07-19-2015, 09:28 AM)Fluffyball Wrote: Why not to make just two core statuses then?

100% core for rightful tech users and 80% core for the ones, who aren't supposed to use that tech - all based on the ID? Why to make ship-comp, while we could just do a thing, if one item does not belong to the ID, core falls automatically to 80% because of that thing.

90% core is for people who have basic access to the tech (vide Xeno-Zoners or Ageira-APM) and 100% if both factions agreed in RP to give full access to the tech (vide certain Corsair-Hogosha ships). I mean, some tech nerfs do not have much sense nowadays, since Kusari corps are still nerfed against Bretonia (10%), despite both being at peace and having warmed up relations a bit. There also was situation in which one purely civilian ship gave 90% core to the Pirate ID, out of all sudden.

Isn't that more simple than having ship-comp?

More simple Yes.
More realistic, no.

We've both seen how the player base loves to cross the line and do anything they can to get away with it.

You can tell a child to sit down at the dinner table, who doesn't want to sit down. Telling them to sit at the table or no supper, they will sit. They want to stand, but remain sitting none the less.
You pull the chair out and wait for that same child to sit at the dinner table and they will, at most, take the food and sit in the other room. That's a problem

Physical restraints must be made when there, again, is a player base that will not play by the rules. Especially when they are long standing players looking for an exploit.

To what Antonio said, I think I started playing when they were just about changing all this. If I remember correctly, independent players were angry that faction players had the tech advantage when in a battle. We didn't have mining ratio restrictions and mining turrets then either. I think this would be too vanilla for most.
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Karst - 07-18-2015, 04:20 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Lythrilux - 07-18-2015, 04:22 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Kauket - 07-18-2015, 04:37 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Enkidu - 07-18-2015, 04:36 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Wildkins - 07-18-2015, 04:40 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Corile - 07-18-2015, 04:41 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Alley - 07-18-2015, 04:44 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by SpaceTime - 07-18-2015, 04:47 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Karst - 07-18-2015, 05:32 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Tyria Regalia - 07-18-2015, 05:48 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Antonio - 07-18-2015, 05:54 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Fluffyball - 07-18-2015, 06:07 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Adam_Spire - 07-19-2015, 04:36 AM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Coin - 07-18-2015, 05:58 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Tyria Regalia - 07-18-2015, 06:07 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Alestone - 07-18-2015, 08:28 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Tyria Regalia - 07-18-2015, 08:31 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by pillow - 07-18-2015, 06:20 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Haste - 07-19-2015, 12:01 AM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Blodo - 07-19-2015, 01:30 AM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Haste - 07-19-2015, 01:53 AM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Karst - 07-19-2015, 12:57 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Thyrzul - 07-19-2015, 09:22 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Blodo - 07-19-2015, 10:05 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Sabru - 07-19-2015, 01:40 AM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Fluffyball - 07-19-2015, 09:28 AM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Adam_Spire - 07-19-2015, 01:15 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Sylvie557 - 07-19-2015, 09:35 AM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Fluffyball - 07-19-2015, 09:38 AM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Antonio - 07-19-2015, 09:41 AM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Fluffyball - 07-19-2015, 10:26 AM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Antonio - 07-19-2015, 02:58 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Sylvie557 - 07-19-2015, 03:01 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Fluffyball - 07-19-2015, 03:03 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Antonio - 07-19-2015, 10:04 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Lythrilux - 07-19-2015, 10:08 PM
RE: Ship-based technerf thread one billion - by Haste - 07-19-2015, 10:52 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode