(05-07-2016, 10:22 AM)Sombra Hookier Wrote: That had nothing to do with the topic. It's just picking on words and phrases that you think aren't fitting, but are gameplay-wise/ID-wise in an ooRP forum thread. Also, I got your point, but don't expect someone here to write absolutely political correct posts for explaining simple things. I'm not a politician and this is a forum about a game. Please don't expect other people to be more perfect than you are. No need to start discussions about "I think you used the wrong term there" while being told to stay on the topic twice.
What topic exactly? You said something, I corrected you and then you went on defending your misuse of terminology even though you could just have let it go with an "okay, not lawful then, but pretending, now get back to the actual topic". If whether you used the correct term or not wasn't the topic or anywhere related to it, why did you continue?
(05-07-2016, 10:10 AM)Sombra Hookier Wrote:
Quote:We weren't discussing who's good and who's bad, we were discussing who's lawful and who's unlawful, you brought up that point at least. Learn the difference. GRN is bad but also lawful. If we discuss who's good and who's bad we have a lot easier task: Core is bad. Or rather, evil.
Quote:picking phrases and words that aren't 100% the way formulated you want doesn't make the discussion better
Quote:this isn't a discussion thread
The topic was about Core behavior in Delta. I explained why Core does behave like that, used a term that is totally legit to use for Core, as Core is described by the mod as a lawful faction, and you started a discussion in the Core feedback thread about an indi Core player using not the, in your opinion, right term, which was not relevant for any related of the topic. Then you started to sell it as a feedback, not to Core, but to an indi Core player who wasn't using the terms that in your opinion aren't the okay ones in a totally other matter.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not heated about that and my opinion of you won't be better or worse for your opinion of "Is it the right term?", but all I say, now for the third time, is to not pick on some stupid, subjective to be seen words that you think aren't right and try to have the last word on this seemingly very important matter. It's a feedback thread for Core, some criticised the behavior of Core and I tried to explain why it's okay the way it is.
If you still want to discuss about terms or people who don't use the terms the way you want, do it outside this thread. It has simply no relevance for this thread, because I hardly doubt it's very important to criticise someone in a feedback forum for that. Simply don't try to justify that. Leave it as it is, come back here when you have something to give a feedback.
