(07-01-2016, 04:11 PM)Captain_Nemo Wrote: well, either way point #2 won't be met, who agrees to terms they can't see
Who agrees with sanctions with evidence they can't see?
Like I said earlier on skype, if everyone is going to claim the moral high ground, someone actually needs to be on it
I believe the second point should read something along the line of "should additional provisions be necessary they will be discussed at a later time in a transparent format"