(08-19-2016, 10:45 PM)Skorak Wrote: I see that. But I and everyone I ever talked to, enjoyed random unplanned encounters more than a planned event.
But I guess that is a thing of taste and from the outside it will look like "yet another Liberty event".
Well now you can talk to someone enjoying a bit more if what he cared to put effort into actually gets done.
(08-19-2016, 10:50 PM)Arioch Wrote: From what I have seen, players initiated everything happening now, then were stuck in a weird land of "is this ok to do/continue per ID rules/Server rules?" and repeated questions/inquiries to the Admins about it, to then we had a couple different posts/PM's asking Admins to do an event or something regarding the situation. So either we ignore this and do one of the other events that (I agree) should have already been done and get yelled at by those wanting an update regarding the current stalemate regarding liberty, or we do the Liberty event real quick since both sides were waiting for what's going to happen, but we then run the risk of what is happening now with people asking 'Well why Liberty and not these other ones?".
I wonder what would have happened if we let players themselves finish what they've started in the first place, perhaps wait for some statement from LibGov (I kinda recall not one person beside me waiting for such), or maybe just try to solve the controversy BlackFart pointed out where while both sides jumped at eachother's throats for suspecting infection among the other's ranks, LN and LSF still hunt nomads together, side by side.