A message from above?

[n00bl3t]

Let's flip this around since we are going to play by "Ha! We got ya!" rules.

It's no longer ooc for an indie cap ship owner to realize he can't trust the bigger groups in his own faction --they might try to seize conttrol or destroy his vessel.

So he's perfectly legit in treating such groups as hostile if they have declared hostilities against him.

He can find allied faction independents and seek their assistance as well.

So don't cry when you have a civil war and say its the indie's fault. Ya'll started it--its the rp you chose to have and made a "rule of"--enjoy.

CSW-http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=17253

One can do all the steps of "good" roleplay, one can pay all the fees, one can communitcate with faction leaders ahead of time, and one can pay all the dues to admin and players but in the end its who the admin like, that get heard.

We cant be giveing any new powers to factions if we no longer have the ability to make new factions. Has anyone been approved yet? Has anyone gotten a reason that was promised in the same thread that made us pay 500 million credits? No, so unless the system works like it says there is no need to place anymore restrictions or give established faction more powers when there are no real checks.

A real check would be a real possibility to creat a new faction that gets approved or denied with reason in under a month, otherwise we have closed insiders clubs that start to govern who gets to fly what and, god forbid you get on the bad side of anyone in an established faction who has a character in every major faction.

No, not fair. Why should any player have to measure up to another players RP meter for the right to fly these pixels? If that player finds that another character may cause some changes they dont like they may deny them reguardless of RP. Whats that called? Whatever it is I dont want it here.

Forum justice is not fair or reliable.

/signed. (I might sig a certain part of this which I like)

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.