The Republic Of Liberty - Feedback and Reminder Thread

[SnakThree]

Is this a low-effort attempt to skew reality and to slander someone in such petty way?

Lmao.

Thanks for the logs, I wasn't able to dig that up on my end. You're proving my point though, especially the one line where you outright state it's a good deal for both Houses to just set aside tension from patrolling the border if it means cracking down on unlawfuls. Which was the exact thing I was expressing my dislike for in that conversation.

You're the archetypical representation of why the new system is necessary. Again, thank you for the logs, I really needed to be reminded how bad things used to be so I can properly appreciate how far we've come.

Imagine you liking independent worlds, lawful players not liking that they can't be controlled in the slightest and taking on personal mission to count that as LibGov being horrible for wanting to patrol those systems and enforce laws (which is allowed since introductions of ID permissions, with exception of POBs which most people plopped left and right with no regards towards anything).

My opinion is one singular opinion between 14 people in LibGov. LibGov is great example how different people come together, vote on things and 51% of votes means it is done, whether the other half likes it or not.

You are cherry picking things to suit you based on personal discussions we had. That's great representation of you being archetypal misrepresentator to suit your needs, and going after the person, not the process.

I never claim that I don't make mistakes. And at no point have I claimed LibGov is perfect. But we certainly do our best to be fair and have biggest number of representatives that staff essentially want to filter out.

So far you only prove that you have zero understanding how LibGov actually operates and are barking at the wrong issue.

Amusingly they never reached out to us at all. Seems your conversation did what you hoped for, Reeves.

That's because the whole conversation was theoretical but Reeves is taking it for granted as if personal thoughts are actionable and set in stone to happen.

---