(10-26-2023, 10:38 AM)SnakThree Wrote: Or are you so hell bent on having your precious independent worlds untouched that you tunnel vision and blame it on one person who voiced different opinion to yours?
I'm just waiting for you to recognise the irony of saying that LibGov values input immensely while juxtaposed with the track record of stonewalling people for one reason or another. Surely you can recognise these two things as not going together.
Again, if this is about IC when they did not want to be counted as Liberty faction and went same route as OSC now, I explained my view and the fact that voting system would take into account the majority of votes, not just mine. So the voting process would work even if couple of people didn't agree with it. You have failed to provide substantial evidence to this and are stil barking up the wrong tree. And as I see it, no amount of evidence from our side would change your view because you don't look to be flexible and have ability to change your opinion when presented with facts
Seeing as you would consider any potential criticism a low effort attempt to slander your reputation, I'm going to have to cite hypocrisy in response to this. If you're immediately defensive at the threshold it really does say enough, pot's calling the kettle black in short.
That's because your feedback is factually incorrect. People who provide feedback how to improve LibGov and laws have been heard and some changes were implemented. Yours is unfounded accusations that haven't been done in reality. You talk about stonewalling someone but it's not true and you haven't provided evidence to the contrary. If you would, then I would take responsibility if it was my personal fault.