(10-28-2024, 08:27 PM)Prysin Wrote: Laws are there for a reason. Exemptions should never be granted "because i would like one". It doesnt work that way iRL, it doesnt work that way logically, and it shouldnt work that way in disco.
We are ROLEPLAYING, meaning here, we shall act as if we were doing this as a iRL job. Otherwise whats the point. Just toss the roleplay out and do what you want. Engage silently. Shoot whomever. Just play how you want. But i know you yourself would bemoan such a situation more then anyone, because you know what a mess it would turn into.
As for the transports themselves, perhaps some further transparency and patch notes in the intention of transports going forward would make people less inclined to restrict them right away. But god forbid transparency.
Yeah okay here's the thing though.
This isn't iRL, and this isn't a job. It's a game.
The point of playing government bureaucrats isn't to blanket deny everything that is asked for with the stunningly amazing RP of "we see no need to grant this" because "that's what they'd do IRL", it's to engage with other players.
If a government just blanket denies every such request, you know what will happen? Those characters just aren't going to visit that house. It's not like they can readily unmount and put into storage their cloak or whatever that Rheinland doesn't deem necessary literally every time they fly into or out of their jurisdiction.
They'll just be like, okay, fuck these guys, guess I'll play somewhere else, followed by house players whining about how their house is inactive. Their takeaway isn't going to be "WOW it's so great how these people play bureaucrats who suck!!"