I formally request permission to post Scype chat.

[ScornStar]

I can hardly argue with MajKP. Its his physical property after all. However I will say I respectfully disagree. What I posted was a conversation that I was a part of. It involved the way things run here. There was no vulgarity or personal insult there. Nothing inherently offensive. It was my intellectual property as well as thiers and the desicion effects how the whole communities understanding of how things work here.

I felt it was unjust so I posted it. If the admin are willing to stand by thier decisions and statments then why hide them from public? It would only bolster support for thier decision and shut me up even faster. However, it smacks of cover up and an acknowledgement that something is not right.

If I am in fact wrong then I ask admin permission for the community to review our conversation. I have nothing to hide and maybe much to learn. Is admin willing to stand tall next to thier statments in front of the community?

If this request is declined then one has to wonder what are they hideing and what do they hope to gain from hideing it? Why so much cloak and dagger action about some civil PMs discussing a just desicion? Let the PM be a demonstration to the public of our admin fairness.

Heck I'll post a copy and they can post a copy, we can let the public compair. Showing these PMs would give the sort of transparency and open honesty we all crave and asked for. If I'm as wrong as admin indicates then showing this would show everyone how fair admin is and how wrong I am.

What does the admin team have to gain from denying it. Denial in my eyes is either spite or acknowledgement of guilt.

---

Eat Babies!!!!!!!!!!

Join our cause for a baby free world.

Harvester diplomacy