• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion Discovery Mod Balance
« Previous 1 … 44 45 46 47 48 … 55 Next »
BHG Warships. A flawed concept?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Thread Closed 
BHG Warships. A flawed concept?
Offline NonSequitor
01-24-2009, 08:17 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-24-2009, 08:35 PM by NonSequitor.)
#12
Member
Posts: 911
Threads: 116
Joined: Dec 2007

Hmmm... Yep, I think I'm going to take the risk of offending some sensibilities with this post.

The question is whether or not the BH should have warships at all (dessies on up). Many newer players seem to gravitate to the BH. I say "many" because I notice a fair amount going into other factions and procuring their cap ships there.

Since there is no player faction to enforce warship usage (and I don't think it's even possible anymore in light of some current decisions) , many trade until they get enough for a BC or a BS. Dessies don't seem to be too popular. Then the complaints begin. Many are justified complaints centering around lack of rp and fairplay. And some seem to be complaints made for the sake of complaining about something.

However, I am still holding out hope that the next mod's guidelines will help to restrict cap misuse - from all sides. But I'm not so naive as to believe that the entire problem will fade away. Or that everyone will be satisfied.

When I got here a little over a year ago, I wanted to go BH. That was before I even knew about BH warships. I was BH on a previous server, and I thought that would be a fun route to go here.

I was honestly surprised that the BH had a capship line. On the same token, I was suprised that some of the unlawfuls had a capship line. Really.

If you want to approach the question of capships being rp or oorp for a given faction from a semi-realistic (as realistic as you can be in a game) perspective, in all honesty I find it difficult to believe that the BH can construct and maintain a capship fleet. Now gunships / gunboats I see as being possible, but constructing and fielding anything larger would demand an enormous amount of resources. I say this as the owner of a BS and dessie.

Now, if the larger unlawful faction are completely candid with themselves they might come to a similar conclusion about their own fleet compositions. I can say, with a minimum of bias (no one is capable of being completely unbiased), that I have no idea why Corsairs, Outcasts, Lane Hackers, Red Hessians, Blood Dragons, Liberty Rogues, Mollys (hope I didn't leave any of the heavy hitters out) can have the resources to construct anything larger than a gunboat.

Ok, I'm pretty sure that some unlawful faction player with respond with a lengthy post of how his/her faction should have access to everything from gunboats to planet-busting space stations. Everyone has their own rationale of how the status quo is possible. It's a painful proposition to sacrifice perceived benefits.

However, the ultimate decision on capship availability lies with Igiss. This is his baby, after all.

But, if a serious decision were made to to nix warships from the BH, I would hope the decision would extend to the unlawfuls as well. The Zoners and the Order would probably have to lose their warships too, if we were to follow a similar line of logic (any Nomad threat could be countered with gunboats, bombers and fighters, so no real need for anything larger). That way, only House militaries would have warships in their fleets - which makes a lot of sense when you think about it.
 
Thread Closed 


Messages In This Thread
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Carlos_Benitez - 01-24-2009, 07:27 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Guest - 01-24-2009, 07:29 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Tenacity - 01-24-2009, 07:29 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Death Shadow - 01-24-2009, 07:30 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Dusty Lens - 01-24-2009, 07:37 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Nightwind - 01-24-2009, 07:41 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Tenacity - 01-24-2009, 07:44 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by El Nino - 01-24-2009, 07:46 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Derkylos - 01-24-2009, 07:46 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Robert.Fitzgerald - 01-24-2009, 07:58 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by greasemunky - 01-24-2009, 08:01 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by NonSequitor - 01-24-2009, 08:17 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Dashiell - 01-24-2009, 08:37 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Jinx - 01-24-2009, 08:42 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Dashiell - 01-24-2009, 08:47 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Agmen of Eladesor - 01-24-2009, 08:51 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Dusty Lens - 01-24-2009, 09:02 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Agmen of Eladesor - 01-24-2009, 09:20 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Coin - 01-25-2009, 04:23 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Cosmos - 01-25-2009, 05:15 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Quorg - 01-25-2009, 05:53 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Death Shadow - 01-25-2009, 07:16 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by swift - 01-25-2009, 07:27 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Death Shadow - 01-25-2009, 07:36 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by swift - 01-25-2009, 07:39 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Chico - 01-25-2009, 08:05 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by swift - 01-25-2009, 08:09 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Caedes - 01-25-2009, 08:10 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Kontrazec (Somni) - 01-25-2009, 08:29 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Jamez - 01-25-2009, 08:34 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Derkylos - 01-25-2009, 09:04 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Quorg - 01-25-2009, 10:13 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Har3 - 01-25-2009, 10:25 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by marko06 - 01-26-2009, 12:09 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by SigCorps - 01-26-2009, 12:44 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Har3 - 01-26-2009, 12:58 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Markus_Janus - 01-26-2009, 01:01 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Derkylos - 01-26-2009, 01:18 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Har3 - 01-26-2009, 01:57 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by casero - 01-26-2009, 04:31 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Derkylos - 01-26-2009, 04:57 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Bad.Wolf - 01-26-2009, 08:00 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Athenian - 01-26-2009, 10:07 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Kambei - 01-26-2009, 10:53 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Har3 - 01-26-2009, 12:13 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Baltar - 01-26-2009, 02:07 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Markus_Janus - 01-26-2009, 02:22 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Kambei - 01-26-2009, 02:27 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Blodo - 01-26-2009, 02:34 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Baltar - 01-26-2009, 02:35 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Kambei - 01-26-2009, 02:39 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Markus_Janus - 01-26-2009, 02:48 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Jinx - 01-26-2009, 02:57 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by casero - 01-26-2009, 03:02 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Har3 - 01-26-2009, 03:28 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Robert.Fitzgerald - 01-26-2009, 03:31 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by teschy - 01-26-2009, 03:39 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by NonSequitor - 01-26-2009, 03:39 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by casero - 01-26-2009, 04:00 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Har3 - 01-26-2009, 04:07 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by casero - 01-26-2009, 04:13 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Robert.Fitzgerald - 01-26-2009, 04:26 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Kambei - 01-26-2009, 05:28 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by pchwang - 01-26-2009, 06:00 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Robert.Fitzgerald - 01-26-2009, 06:06 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Agmen of Eladesor - 01-27-2009, 02:31 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Dusty Lens - 01-27-2009, 03:08 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Baltar - 01-27-2009, 07:14 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Dusty Lens - 01-27-2009, 07:54 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Baltar - 01-27-2009, 08:01 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by DarkOddity - 01-27-2009, 08:34 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Baltar - 01-27-2009, 08:40 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Markus_Janus - 01-27-2009, 09:00 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by DarkOddity - 01-27-2009, 09:14 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Markus_Janus - 01-27-2009, 09:21 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by DarkOddity - 01-27-2009, 09:26 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Athenian - 01-27-2009, 09:41 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by DarkOddity - 01-27-2009, 09:59 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by NonSequitor - 01-27-2009, 10:43 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by DarkOddity - 01-27-2009, 10:58 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by carlabrams - 01-27-2009, 05:16 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Dashiell - 01-27-2009, 07:57 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by FooFighter - 01-28-2009, 03:08 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by SigCorps - 01-29-2009, 04:04 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Agmen of Eladesor - 01-29-2009, 04:39 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Baltar - 01-29-2009, 05:04 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Camtheman Of Freelancer4Ever - 01-31-2009, 08:07 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Robert.Fitzgerald - 01-31-2009, 08:22 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Carlos_Benitez - 01-31-2009, 12:23 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Athenian - 01-31-2009, 12:31 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Jinx - 01-31-2009, 12:43 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Dashiell - 01-31-2009, 04:55 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Petersen - 02-01-2009, 10:11 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Cosmos - 02-02-2009, 02:16 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Jinx - 02-02-2009, 02:27 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Athenian - 02-02-2009, 02:31 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by A51 Shipper - 02-03-2009, 03:40 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by BaneBlade - 02-03-2009, 08:29 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by tazuras - 02-03-2009, 08:55 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by BaneBlade - 02-03-2009, 09:01 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by tazuras - 02-03-2009, 09:05 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Athenian - 02-03-2009, 10:05 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Dashiell - 02-03-2009, 02:18 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by torchwood - 02-03-2009, 10:09 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by harecrow - 02-04-2009, 02:04 AM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Dashiell - 02-04-2009, 12:07 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by torchwood - 02-04-2009, 05:52 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by kindred - 02-04-2009, 06:02 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by hornet - 02-04-2009, 07:48 PM
BHG Warships. A flawed concept? - by Athenian - 02-04-2009, 08:23 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode