INVOLNERABLE SHIELDS USED BY SF|

[Yngen]

So thats what got me sparked up a little , I had simular problem with =Bsg= Where 1 ship was a pirate and My other was a train . Yet Once a pirate Always 1? ..
Well the =BSG= did see this after , and let it go.

Warhorse, you had both your pirate RH bomber(MMZwarhorse) in Cambridge and your Bounty Hunter Reinland Cruiser (Warhorse) there. The fact that you can use your Bounty hunter to get intelligence on the location of potential targets for your pirate, do a quick switch and attack, then go back to your Bounty hunter(which is what you did,) like nothing ever happened is why you were ordered out of Cambridge. FireAnt was perfectly justified in making the order to have you removed, one way or the other. You accomplished the same feat weeks ago when BSG was policing cambridge: The last warhorse incident which is why we ordered both of your ships out of system then as well. Your trading character/Bounty hunter character is consistently seen in coordination with pirates.

You seem to be somewhat of a flameartist Warhorse but I'll take the bait anways. You have accused BSG of breaking rules, going against RP, being bullies, whatever But I challenge you to look at the situation in our eyes. Put a little more thought into your actions, have a reason for placing your characters in the spots they are in and accept the concequences thereof. Do SOMETHING, rather than sit around in the most heavily populated system in Sirius watching for road kill and blood to vulch on. Decide whos side you are on, and stick to it.

F1 during any engagement is against server rules:



My pics are usually too dark, but here we see Warhorse F1ing. I don't care to see Warhorse banned, but I would appreciate some honesty and transparency when we start attacking the image of another faction.

---

[AU]Anton_Blix
-Signature by Doom