• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 522 523 524 525 526 … 778 Next »
NEED THIS CLARIFIED

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

NEED THIS CLARIFIED
Offline JIVA
07-18-2009, 11:08 PM,
#19
Member
Posts: 380
Threads: 19
Joined: Jan 2008

think of it as that... - if you are flying a ship that is fighting another ship that has fled out of effective weaponrange - and you have no chance to catch up to get it into your weaponrange - what will you consider it?

a carrier has no effectiveway to harm a battleship at 5k - the missile do hit. but i highly doubt that you can chew through the shields. - its a bit of a bugger - a situation like a very light fighter. - dodging all the time until all eternity. - never attempting to attack .... is it effectively participating in a combat? or is it just stalling the fight.

if you feel thta the BHG BS , having no chance to fight you ... should have retreated from the system for up to 4 hours. - and you apply this rule to yourself, if you are in the position of the BS next time... you re good to go to assume that the BHGs were wrong.

if you do however think that stalling a combat like that ... forcing a retreat in that way "deserved" a 4 hours lock from a retreat is NOT ok ... then you should not have assumed them fleeing.

would have been best to just agree, that both had retreated from one another - and maybe don t insist on retreats at all ( from both sides ) - insisting on a rule is detrimental ( from both sides ) and harms gameplay - for those involved.

[Image: JIVA_Sig_zps4e7f97f1.png]
the [JIVA] group
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by reavengitair - 07-18-2009, 11:59 AM
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by Tovig - 07-18-2009, 12:01 PM
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by Tomtomrawr - 07-18-2009, 12:03 PM
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by n00bl3t - 07-18-2009, 12:08 PM
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by Bauer - 07-18-2009, 12:08 PM
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by Cannon - 07-18-2009, 12:33 PM
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by Guest - 07-18-2009, 01:16 PM
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by Linkus - 07-18-2009, 01:32 PM
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by Thurgret - 07-18-2009, 01:36 PM
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by Agmen of Eladesor - 07-18-2009, 05:00 PM
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by Klaw117 - 07-18-2009, 05:16 PM
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by MarvinCZ - 07-18-2009, 05:33 PM
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by Hawkwings - 07-18-2009, 06:41 PM
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by Horon - 07-18-2009, 06:44 PM
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by Tenacity - 07-18-2009, 07:02 PM
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by Hawkwings - 07-18-2009, 07:07 PM
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by Magoo! - 07-18-2009, 07:09 PM
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by reavengitair - 07-18-2009, 10:51 PM
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by JIVA - 07-18-2009, 11:08 PM
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by reavengitair - 07-18-2009, 11:15 PM
NEED THIS CLARIFIED - by DragonLancer - 07-18-2009, 11:30 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode