' Wrote:Sindroms specifically wanted some inflammatory material removed, and rightfully so from the looks of it.
An "OP" can also request that a topic be closed. Wouldn't you rather have one gadfly swatted than having everyone's "fun" curtailed by closing the thread?
Will pink do, Mr. n00bl3t?
Mal the question remains, does the thread starter have the right to decide who can post and what they can post in a thread, which is what Mwerte's post stated. Or is it only inflamitory posts?
' Wrote:It will be removed. My stance has always been that the origional author of a thread is in charge of that thread, unless it is deamed to be abusive (I.E. a trial by forum) or unsuitable for the forums. As such, they can request thread "cleanings", someone to stay out of that thread, thread to be deleted/locked, ect.
So yes, if someone asks a question and then doesn't like the answers they can be removed. I see it as an anti-troll measure. (Troll: someone looking to spit in someone's eye to cause an argument for personal pleasure).