To the Official Owners of Freeport 14

[Dab]

Incoming Transmission
Comm ID: Aurelia Silvan

As Mr. White said, any Coalition-ran no-fire zone would be outside of the standard 5K Zoner no-fire zone. Inside of the 5K, no-fire zone disagreements would be handled by Zoners only, not the Coalition. In the past we have tried allowing others to police our no-fire zones in several locations, and each time it turned out to be more a curse than a blessing. I'd also discourage you from making all of Yukon a no-fire zone. First, if the Liberty Navy hears you trying to do this, they may be tempted to come to Yukon to stop you or take some other action. Also, no-fire zones today are mainly in force to prevent damage to our stations, so making an entire system a no-fire zone doesn't quite fit that goal, but is 'overkill.' Just a suggestion, our station's 'territory' is simply the 5K distance around the station, what happens outside is not our jurisdiction.

On the issue of leasing, I think we can lease the use of the station, including several parts of it.. However, the station itself would remain under our 'flag' so-to-speak. The Zoners. The Coalition would be considered a lease only, such as with an apartment. The facilities are used by someone, but the building itself is still property of the original owner.

And as was also mentioned, Freeport 14 would require extended habitation modules to sustain a larger population. Since these people will be from the Coalition, it makes sense that they provide the funds to build these extensions, which you have already agreed to from what I understand.

My only issue is that it seems like you are trying to make Freeport 14 more 'property' of the Coalition than just a simple lease..

-Aurelia Silvan

<div align="right]End Transmission

---