' Wrote:There is a common sense reason why we don't gather a group of Battelships, point our reticles at the mooring point of a planet and stick our coffee cup on the right mouse button. Why didn't you guys fire at a different spot of the base or from a different angle other then the very specific spot below the base where ships appear?
It's very simple.
They didn't fire "at a different spot of the base from a different angle" because "they wanted to prevent the base from getting supplied by cloaked transports".
Something like "we don't care, kill the base at all costs, shoot the transports so they won't supply it".
Oh, and that rage about "the game mechanics"...
You guys sound funny. Really.
You know that those who have the evidence are right, not those who are ACTUALLY right. (I am not saying you were right in this incident; but that's how everything here is done.)
And now you are raging because someone was "abusing the game mechanics" without any evidence...
I am sure you don't have it because you are posting here. Otherwise, you would just fill a report.
Also, Govedo, if you think that current base shield system is not... Let's say, "valid", post here instead of creating another Q_Q-rage thread.
Quote:Undocking transports from same quickdock trying to die in order to fill sanction report or waiting for the attacking party to stop shooting and distracting them on the quickdock in order to resupply the base again with cloaked ships. Before the resupply the base was on 39% and was loosing 1% health each 2 minutes and it would be killed without resupply.
Wait... What? Transports trying to... "Die"? "In order to fill sanction report"? Aren't you joking?
I guess transports are supposed to supply the base, not to stand at place and wait for attackers to shoot it "in order to fill a sanction report".
And yes, I was there. And I've seen everything very well.