.:j:. Junker Congress Faction Feedback

[Ghost Reaver]

Your company has shot up Junkers in the past. Dusty's reaver made a mess for us in Liberty, and Zelot's reaver only yesterday shot up my CSV.

So no, we are not paying your company to shoot our enemies.

Denying a mercenary is completely fine. I do not care about that.

Personally I don't even want to work for your Faction, it was not even my decision to post in that thread as I'm not the decision maker of the Reavers.

However, TFinnegan clearly uses the excuse of the AFA-Reaver deal as the reason for denying us, thus using information he has no idea about. The reason I'm 100% he refers to this deal, is because it's not only very recent, but he is using his character's past history with the Blood Dragons, as an excuse to know about information that has been transferred over a Forums Communications Thread.

This is more about the principle rather than anything else. It is not cool to see someone metagame with a lame excuse as to how he acquired the information.

Again, I ask you to rephrase that post with a proper motivation. Say we shot you or something, but don't claim you are aware of any kind of contract. Especially one that sources from Kusari, which is the only reason why he would mention anything about Blood Dragons and you know this as well.

Finally, he even refers to a "contract". That is even more obvious what he is talking about.