Quote:and with a bomber to kill you if you do not.
Exactly as now, you mean? At least, Akegata can withstand more than BWT.
Quote: And they can do it infront of navy cause it will be legal.
It means I`ll have more reasons to Q_Q about piracy being OP.:D
Right now, smuggler`s ID is exactly like a free trader`s ID, only worse, because it attracts unwanted attention.
With a new smuggler`s ID you can just swap yours for Freelancer one and continue smuggling exactly as now. Or keep smuggler`s ID, get access to more powerful ships, but exchange it for lawful LOLGANKS.
There is NO problem that can`t be solved by the use of high explosives.
' Wrote:Hunting down criminals in destroyers you say... That is as vague a description as it can get.
Ok, to be more precise, chasing down Lane Hacker/Rogue/Indy Pirate Bombers/Gunboats in Magellan in Threshers, though I've also seen you shooting up Outcasts in the Taus with/for the CR/IMG.
And it's not just you, there have been numerous incidents of indy Makos sitting in the Taus shooting Outcasts, which is exactly the opposite of what the Core is meant to do. And it is also strikingly similar to the days of .84, where BHG Battlecruisers would be regularly sighted in the Houses chasing down criminals and escorting traders, not something many people would like to see again.
However, I feel this is getting a bit off-topic, so unless I spot another issue with the IDs, I'll butt out.
Dusty, The IC ID really does seem a little off from our current RP as a very neutral and widespread faction. I notice it is the only coorperate ID which specifically names the liberty house as our ZOI, not even the USI ID sdoes that, and it's far far more liberty centric than IC was ever meant to be.
I do support the privateering clause in the house trader ID's, as I believe it will make for some very interesting RP as well as boost activity in trading factions. However, I would suggest that this right be limited t only to the trading factions with the absolute strongest connections to their house (i.e. USI, Republican, Samura (or kishiro if the regime changes), and Bowex. Otherwise, you run the risk of polarizing and severely hampering trade anywhere. For instance, if this rule were currently active, arrangements like Ageira's upkeep of the Rheinland lanes, at the request of the Rheinland government, would no longer be possible.
I'd like to speak for the GRP here. Why was the core element of its roleplay regarding its corruption removed? As far as I can see, it's the same as the GRN ID, only with one letter changed in the name.
"THE HULL HAS BEEN BREACHED AND THESCIENCEIS LEAKING OUT!"
' Wrote:I'd like to speak for the GRP here. Why was the core element of its roleplay regarding its corruption removed? As far as I can see, it's the same as the GRN ID, only with one letter changed in the name.
It'll be readded. As mentioned these are roughs to asses the broad strokes.
That being said I think I'll stop this all here and get to work sifting through what's been plopped.