• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 124 125 126 127 128 … 546 Next »
Give Junkers a Large Transport Hybrid!

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Give Junkers a Large Transport Hybrid!
Offline Lythrilux
12-28-2013, 05:26 PM,
#11
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,343
Threads: 736
Joined: Jan 2013

Dunno, 2 isn't really considered a threat, however they're still cruiser guns.
Ultimately, it's up to the house governments to enforce that rule.
As leader of a Junker faction that is often against the odds and would sometimes really need a Junker cruiser, I'm against this idea.
A lot of junkering can be seen acting like house Zoners.
Ergo, I don't think a Junker cruiser would be a good idea as it'd just metamorphosize tthe Junker image into Zoner foolery.
Plus, what would house lawfuls say/do if they saw a Junker cruiser flying around?

Besides what on earth would Junkers need a cruiser for? Only reason I can think of is that Junkers who are fighting para-military forces or house law enforcement might be a bit too tough for them from time to time.

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Reply  
Offline .Gypsy.
12-28-2013, 05:29 PM,
#12
Member
Posts: 496
Threads: 43
Joined: May 2010

Well talking it out like this could come up with some kind of cool idea?

[Image: ShadowTek.gif]
Reply  
Offline Ponge
12-28-2013, 05:49 PM, (This post was last modified: 12-28-2013, 05:52 PM by Ponge.)
#13
Member
Posts: 1,266
Threads: 103
Joined: Feb 2013

I am totally against the cruiser idea, it would make House military/other paramilitary pretty nervous and agitated around Junkers, knowing they have serious firepower on their hands. Not to mention that non-House military cruisers are banned from every House; where would you use them? Junkers are simply not that faction who needs them. You want more firepower? Hire a Rogue/Hessian/Molly/etc cruiser as backup/escort.
And ask/observe Lythrilux's group what Junkers are capable of when they have to fight.

Zoners... Well, no matter how peaceful they are, they live near the Nomads/Wilds, and they live in the harsh Edge Worlds, so it seems somewhat justified.

And take a look at this if you haven't already:
http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=106536

[Image: 2whqqh0.png]
Reply  
Offline Karst
12-28-2013, 06:00 PM,
#14
Chariot of Light
Posts: 2,983
Threads: 214
Joined: Sep 2009

Personally, I'd love to see more unique hybrid class ships.
I think a large transport with some extra punch would be neither overpowered nor particularly illogical if done correctly, it should of course be huge and very slow, sort of like the Pilgrim, and the amount of cruiser turrets should be highly limited. Something like this.

(12-28-2013, 05:23 PM)ShadowTek Wrote: Well, what if it could only mount say 2 cruiser turrets then?

Would give it extra power in certain situations, but still leave it generally vulnerable.
The cargo capacity would be reasonably balanced at around 3900, I'd say.

(12-28-2013, 05:49 PM)Ponge Wrote: I am totally against the cruiser idea, it would make House military/other paramilitary pretty nervous and agitated around Junkers, knowing they have serious firepower on their hands. Not to mention that non-House military cruisers are banned from every House; where would you use them?

That's an inrp problem rather than a balance issue. Sure, house governments would probably ban it - except maybe Rheinland which has very tolerant ship-related laws.
But so what? Would simply provide another reasonable disadvantage.

[Image: jWv1kDa.png]
Reply  
Offline tothebonezone
12-28-2013, 06:07 PM,
#15
Banned
Posts: 1,016
Threads: 49
Joined: Mar 2013

(12-28-2013, 06:00 PM)Karst Wrote: The cargo capacity would be reasonably balanced at around 3900, I'd say.

Oh boy, a transport with cruiser guns.

Just what we need out there pirating.

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=202684
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline Karst
12-28-2013, 06:09 PM,
#16
Chariot of Light
Posts: 2,983
Threads: 214
Joined: Sep 2009

Well it shouldn't have a CD, much like the Salvager doesn't.
And what difference would make? You'd still be better off in a smaller transports with ridiculously powerful Charons.

Pirates already have a ship class with extremely powerful turrets for pirating. They're called transports.

[Image: jWv1kDa.png]
Reply  
Offline Ponge
12-28-2013, 06:24 PM, (This post was last modified: 12-28-2013, 06:26 PM by Ponge.)
#17
Member
Posts: 1,266
Threads: 103
Joined: Feb 2013

The 3900 cargo is not very different from the Pilgrim's 3600.
If a new transport is implemented for Junkers, I'd say give it a proper capacity, like 4300-4500, as Junkers are more about hauling than fighting.
Other: I think if it is to be a hybrid, GB turrets would be enough, as they significantly more powerful than the transport turrets; a battletransport-like vessel with GB turrets and a normal core could take on a gunboat, right? But if it is too OP, all pirates will use it for cargo pirating, and Houses will ban them.
In my opinion, cruiser turrets would be too OP for a transport in any way. Those are military stuff, and leave them to the military.

[Image: 2whqqh0.png]
Reply  
Offline Karst
12-28-2013, 06:31 PM,
#18
Chariot of Light
Posts: 2,983
Threads: 214
Joined: Sep 2009

(12-28-2013, 06:24 PM)Ponge Wrote: Other: I think if it is to be a hybrid, GB turrets would be enough, as they significantly more powerful than the transport turrets; a battletransport-like vessel with GB turrets and a normal core could take on a gunboat, right?

No, it absolutely could not. Keep in mind that in turretsteering fights, turn rate and particularly size are FAR more relevant than number of turrets or armor.

Given equal types of guns, an average-sized gunboat could simply hover around in that band of range when it can hit a battletransport-sized target, but not the other way around, taking very little damage.

The same logic applies to small transports vs large transports, which is why a small transport can beat a large transport easily.

[Image: jWv1kDa.png]
Reply  
Offline Wraga
12-28-2013, 06:33 PM,
#19
Storm Chaser
Posts: 1,767
Threads: 260
Joined: Sep 2010

I'm wondering why junkers need something stronger than a HAU8 salvager...

They dont have powerfull enemies, most of unlawful factions ignore them, lawful forces ignore them. If a junker avoid to enter into Kusari he will get a peacefull life, without the need to shoot a single shot.

[Image: giphy.gif]
  Reply  
Offline Highland Laddie
12-28-2013, 06:44 PM,
#20
Member
Posts: 2,082
Threads: 21
Joined: Mar 2013

Zoners shouldn't have had caps to begin with....certainly nothing above GB strength. We don't need Junkers to become the new Zoners.

You actually have a good transport-hybrid in the Salvager. Enjoy it.
Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode