Posts: 8,131
Threads: 731
Joined: Aug 2008
Staff roles: Moderator
You know something, Albert, the Junkers have the same NFZ at their bases as well yet we never hear about them. I envy them for that.
As for cap ships taking refuge at Freeports, I now do nothing about it. Those who do it aren't going to let anyone stop them anyway and someone will forever take exception to it. Hey, it's what everyone wanted, isn't it?
Doc_Holliday Wrote:You know something, Albert, the Junkers have the same NFZ at their bases as well yet we never hear about them. I envy them for that.
As for cap ships taking refuge at Freeports, I now do nothing about it. Those who do it aren't going to let anyone stop them anyway and someone will forever take exception to it. Hey, it's what everyone wanted, isn't it?
Yeah people will still do it and you wont catch everyone, but you will be able to do something and reply to a guy who says "you let my enemies wage war on me form there". Right now you can only say "sorry, but I cant change it". If you have the additional rule you have an argument that you are trying to control the problem, as long as he provides proof.
I made this thread because of the "no u" bickering going on between BHG-Core, ZOners, and ZOners about FP11. In that case and also with the SCRA/COrsair thing, harboring military attack fleets was the RP reason they gave. I realize it wasnt the only reason they did what they did, but that was actually a VALID RP reason, unlike the other reasons, some might say.
The reason junkers dont have the same problem at theri bases is that they are fewer in number and not in as important places as the Freeports. That and the fact that Junekrs dont have Juggies and Carriers, and arent suposed to be neutral to everyone.