• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 154 155 156 157 158 … 546 Next »
Tradelane weaponry: Remove?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Remove tradelane guns?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes, disarm those things!
50.38%
66 50.38%
Meh, leave em as is
9.92%
13 9.92%
No! They need more firepower!
39.69%
52 39.69%
Total 131 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (10): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 10 Next »
Thread Closed 
Tradelane weaponry: Remove?
Offline Hone
04-08-2013, 05:36 AM,
#11
Banned
Posts: 4,577
Threads: 287
Joined: Jan 2010

(04-08-2013, 01:32 AM)Hone Wrote: Im all for giving solars proper defences but GB turrets on lanes seems excessive! I rekon Fighter turrets on lanes, Transport turrets on Gates and small stations, GB turrets on large stations and docking rings, and Cruiser turrets on military stations. With The BS's having BS turrets of course. Oh yeah, and replace military/police NPCs with MK2s, but reduce their numbers, and implement it in every house. Yeah. If only.

With these weapons I dont think it will discourage activity like it does in gallia atm, and summer is afraid of. But it will make enemy base camping more dangerous, and be more inrp. Which I think we all agree is good dont we?

User was banned for: Griefing others
Time left: (Permanent)
Offline SMGSterlin
04-08-2013, 05:47 AM,
#12
Member
Posts: 2,207
Threads: 81
Joined: Feb 2010

I'd like to see them buffed a bit.

[Image: smgsterlin.gif]
Offline Reid
04-08-2013, 05:51 AM,
#13
Member
Posts: 1,474
Threads: 90
Joined: Jun 2011

I vote we remove them. They're an annoyance.

[Image: bNOgUUq.png]
Offline meoshi
04-08-2013, 05:52 AM,
#14
Random Xeno guy
Posts: 563
Threads: 39
Joined: Oct 2009

Remove them, No point in stressing the server more than it already is.


Offline Irwin
04-08-2013, 05:56 AM,
#15
Banned
Posts: 533
Threads: 40
Joined: Jun 2010

Piracy should be difficult because traders are smart, or because the lawfuls are active. The odds shouldn't be in the favor of traders if no effort's put forth by them as players. If you want to win, you should have to work for it, not let npc's, tradelanes, etc do it for you, that just discourages interaction. I say they should be removed.

User was banned for: Unacceptable behavior
Time left: (Permanent)
Offline JayDee Kasane
04-08-2013, 05:59 AM, (This post was last modified: 04-08-2013, 06:00 AM by JayDee Kasane.)
#16
Member
Posts: 2,023
Threads: 51
Joined: Apr 2011

(04-08-2013, 05:15 AM)AeternusDoleo Wrote: ---and your "force the police to patrol more" idea is frankly, not implementable, that arguement fails. ---

I told that to traders and official police players not Devs. Theres no need to implement more NPC defence, if patrol from 2-3 police players will scare off all pirates however. But I got your point.

Edit: And what Captain Irwin of the Lance said.

[Image: 6FadQ6bTk_g.jpg]
Offline Jayce
04-08-2013, 06:02 AM,
#17
Heads Will Roll
Posts: 2,167
Threads: 141
Joined: Nov 2008

>caring

Why do we bother with TL's when there are things that are more important?

[Image: jKk7NOg.png][Image: 1iGGFXz.gif]
Offline Echo 7-7
04-08-2013, 06:22 AM, (This post was last modified: 04-08-2013, 06:32 AM by Echo 7-7.)
#18
Masterful Modder
Posts: 4,077
Threads: 99
Joined: Sep 2006

Buff Sirian turrets, reduce Gallic turrets.

As Sirian lanes are all built from the same template, there is no lore justification for differences between the Sirian houses.

Edit. There is also no lore justification for Lanes not being armed.

There was a sig here, once.
 
Offline Challenger
04-08-2013, 06:29 AM,
#19
Member
Posts: 182
Threads: 8
Joined: Jun 2011

(04-08-2013, 06:22 AM)Echo 7-7 Wrote: As Sirian lanes are all built from the same template, there is no lore justification for differences between the Sirian houses.

Surely this isn't as black and white as you're making it. Self-defense systems would be auxiliary to the critical lane technology, right? I'm sure the houses could make modifications if they felt it necessary.

If you need an in-RP way to refute the idea, though, maybe legal restrictions put in place by Ageira would be justification enough.
Online monmarfori
04-08-2013, 06:36 AM,
#20
Son of Malta
Posts: 2,159
Threads: 288
Joined: Jan 2010

Try not to change, would be good...
Pages (10): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 10 Next »
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode