• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General News and Announcements
« Previous 1 … 19 20 21 22 23 … 45 Next »
K'hara and Indie Nomad ID changes

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
K'hara and Indie Nomad ID changes
Offline Tunicle
01-02-2016, 12:00 PM,
#31
Server Administrator
Posts: 5,989
Threads: 836
Joined: Jan 2008

Just for clarity, this area is being discussed but the silent engaging was not the root of the complaints, in many situations this fits.

The root problem was the decloaking and instakilling without anybody having a chance to react. If this happens with other ID's and a complaint is made then the sanction can use rule 3.1.

[Image: w3gBAeX.gif]
Reply  
Offline Pavel
01-02-2016, 12:02 PM,
#32
On leave
Posts: 2,018
Threads: 197
Joined: Jan 2012

We are discussing extending cloak changes to everyone.
Wilde was proposed to be included in this change, but the Admin Team decided it'd be unfair for that faction, since it wasn't abusing their cloaks lately.
This is not the right place, but answering earlier question we'll think about adding Tohoku to Indie Nom ID. Make a separate thread about that though.

Edit: Tunicle is ninja
We'll look into Order* and Core silent engaging Nomads.
Reply  
Offline Swallow
01-02-2016, 12:05 PM,
#33
Member
Posts: 4,493
Threads: 213
Joined: Jun 2010

Can it be done in an old-fashion terrorist SRP ID? I am hesitating to say that silent engagement is ooRP action when it is not abused and done right.

FL MOD(EL)MAKING: TOOLS, RESOURCES, TUTORIALS AND MY SHIPS (OLD)

I am on discord: Roal-Yr#5994, I don't log on forum more than a few times a year.

I am not making ships for FL anymore, I am making my own space game instead:
https://github.com/roalyr/GDTLancer
https://roal-yr.itch.io/gdtlancer
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5HQB...cdH45LZgjj
Reply  
Offline Doria
01-02-2016, 12:21 PM,
#34
Omicron Supply Industries
Posts: 718
Threads: 31
Joined: Mar 2013

I don't wanna say "I told ya" but...
Reply  
Offline Moberg
01-02-2016, 12:23 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-02-2016, 12:58 PM by Moberg.)
#35
Member
Posts: 836
Threads: 45
Joined: Jul 2012

(01-02-2016, 12:00 PM)Tunicle Wrote: Just for clarity, this area is being discussed but the silent engaging was not the root of the complaints, in many situations this fits.

The root problem was the decloaking and instakilling without anybody having a chance to react.If this happens with other ID's and a complaint is made then the sanction can use rule 3.1.

Is it really lack of chance to react, or loss of awareness due to playing in silence or alternatively, lack of awareness?
Sure, in my opinion the Nomad RP of kill everything has been overused recently but saying the victims didn't have a chance to react is denial in its purest form. If you are still standing around the moment the Nomad has recharged energy and uncloaks, you deserve the death. I have died to an attack like that once, now I have the game sound louder and my music more silent. Have I died to a cloak attack since then? No.

Though I still died in the fight that commenced (
Reply  
Offline Connor
01-02-2016, 12:33 PM,
#36
Nomadmin
Posts: 3,606
Threads: 327
Joined: Aug 2012

(01-02-2016, 12:00 PM)Tunicle Wrote: The root problem was the decloaking and instakilling without anybody having a chance to react. If this happens with other ID's and a complaint is made then the sanction can use rule 3.1.


If that's the case then every ID needs to be changed in accordance to this then since this happens a lot with other ids. Not just the Nomad ID.

And let's be honest, this was only caused because of the change of leadership and said person handing our Marduks like there's no tomorrow.

[Image: Snoopyman.gif]
Reply  
Online Lythrilux
01-02-2016, 02:29 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-02-2016, 02:30 PM by Lythrilux.)
#37
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,343
Threads: 736
Joined: Jan 2013

(01-02-2016, 12:02 PM)Pavel Wrote: Edit: Tunicle is ninja
We'll look into Order* and Core silent engaging Nomads.

Should be removed tbh. I don't really think either faction needs to be encouraged to silently engage things (the green message also stated they could both silently engage each other). Omicrons might be a PvP orientated environment but discouraging people from at least making engagement notices is neither great nor does it set a good example.

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Reply  
Offline Mephistoles
01-02-2016, 02:43 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-02-2016, 02:43 PM by Mephistoles.)
#38
Gas Miners Guild
Posts: 2,346
Threads: 91
Joined: Jun 2013

(01-02-2016, 12:00 PM)Tunicle Wrote: The root problem was the decloaking and instakilling without anybody having a chance to react. If this happens with other ID's and a complaint is made then the sanction can use rule 3.1.

Is RPing while cloaked and firing immediately on decloak against the rules?

Sigma & GMG Discord Chat: https://discord.gg/d4j3W4v

[Image: stDvDRX.jpg]
Reply  
Offline Antonio
01-02-2016, 02:46 PM,
#39
PvP = RP
Posts: 3,190
Threads: 196
Joined: Nov 2009
Staff roles: Systems Lead

It's not against the rules, as long as the RP lasted for long enough to give the target enough reaction time.

[Image: BMdBL0j.png]
SNAC Montage Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Thruster SNAC
Reply  
Offline Jack_Henderson
01-02-2016, 02:50 PM,
#40
Independent Miners Guild
Posts: 6,103
Threads: 391
Joined: Nov 2010

The root of the problem is permacloak equipment and the unilateral power to decide when you want to interact and when not.
The rule change is necessary, but only treats symptoms.
The source of the problem is in cloak mechanisms that need to be revisited to promote interaction and not limit it.

+ IMG| DISCORD: https://discord.gg/TWrGWjp
+ IMG| IS RECRUITING: Click to find out more!
Reply  
Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode