• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 331 332 333 334 335 … 546 Next »
civilian / generic GB ... part 2

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
civilian / generic GB ... part 2
Offline Ironfoot
02-06-2010, 01:59 AM,
#31
Member
Posts: 314
Threads: 6
Joined: Sep 2008

' Wrote:since i wasn t happy with the first concept i made - i revised it to feature slightly more elegant lines. after all... a civilian gunboat doesn t sell itself by just having the stats... it also needs the looks.

furthermore - i decided rather spontanously that it might be a civilian design that is based in bretonia ( like some minor cooperation building it ) - it ought to be as generic as the eagle ( which is build in liberty ) - but bretonian based.

besides - bretonia isn t blessed with too many ships - even if its not "factionized".

[Image: civiliangunboatmk2.png]

and the bretonian colours make it look quite neat i think.


Rather than a gunboat, Jinx what about this being a replacement for the x-shuttle, it looks quite shuttle liek to me, maybe give it a heavy powerplant, 6 class 10 guns , movement of a vhf but with at least 500 cargo space and a transport shield?

Sell it on the freelancer base.

I think the model looks fantastic though!

[Image: Tomo99-1.png]

  Reply  
Offline Sprolf
02-06-2010, 02:15 AM, (This post was last modified: 02-06-2010, 02:17 AM by Sprolf.)
#32
Member
Posts: 3,052
Threads: 48
Joined: Mar 2009

' Wrote:i'm very much afraid - but that kind of leaves the only really faction able to build a siriuswide ship that is not a house faction... the zoners.

now - people like the ugly brown colour .. might as well just revive the old conference ( as was suggested quite a few times before )

1) I suppose that leaves every single Civilian vessel in the game as "zoner," which would include Transports, Trains, Lifters, Repair Ships, Hawks, Eagles... etc.

That's, of course, wrong. You can have civilian vessels that are produced part time by some shipyards or built by independent contractors - or, more like than not, they're built in terrestrial ship production facilities.

"Civilian," as existed in Freelancer.
Just because a particular corporation doesn't build a ship, that doesn't mean it automatically goes to the Zoners. That might be hard to grasp, but once you do, it's an exceptionally liberating thing.

2) Would be sagacious.

  Reply  
Offline Saronsen
02-06-2010, 02:32 AM,
#33
Member
Posts: 1,687
Threads: 106
Joined: Mar 2009

I'm seeing a lot of

'BAAAAAW, I DON'T LIKE CHANGE'

in recent threads with new ideas about ships.

Sometimes, we get tired of playing a ship that's the same exact as another, with a different model.

Shush.
Reply  
Offline pieguy259
02-06-2010, 02:50 AM,
#34
Member
Posts: 1,334
Threads: 99
Joined: Sep 2008

I always figured the CT line was built by some big houseless corporation. In my mind I've labelled it "Conroy-Thompson Engineering", but that's just me.

Regarding the ship: I wouldn't fly it, personally, if it had a transport shield. If I fly a GB, I'd want it to be all GB.

PanGalactic Travel Company | PanGal Feedback | PanGal Recruitment

[Image: 4662_s.gif]
  Reply  
Offline akka1000
02-06-2010, 03:23 AM,
#35
Member
Posts: 257
Threads: 12
Joined: Mar 2009

I like this a lot, although I think the engine extends out too far
In my mind, that just makes it a big target, blast the engine, and the ship is in trouble

[Image: sig-15664.jpg]
' Wrote:Come on, everyone!

Hark, the Bounty Hunters si-ing,
Death to all the pirate kings...
Goals: To be interviewed by Chris Hansen on Dateline NBC.
  Reply  
Offline n00bl3t
02-06-2010, 03:31 AM, (This post was last modified: 02-06-2010, 03:32 AM by n00bl3t.)
#36
Member
Posts: 7,448
Threads: 108
Joined: Mar 2008

My opinion is that it is a rather nice model, with the exception of the engine, which for some reason does not seem to fit with the rest of the ship. (Perhaps extend the white skin further onto the engine or make the engine shorter?)

Apart from the Bretonian skin, it does not look greatly Bretonian.

Still, the chances of me flying the ship are low.

[Image: hG0lGaj.png]
Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.
Reply  
Offline schlurbi
02-06-2010, 03:49 AM,
#37
Member
Posts: 4,688
Threads: 187
Joined: Apr 2009

I agree with Nooblet about the Engine, but not that it doesnt look like Bretonia. The Front looks like the Shetland. I guess the red Stuff is the Windo right? Is it possible to look through it like the normal Windows?

"Who is it doing this synthetic type of alpha beta psychedelic funkin'?"
[Image: Newgoldensigfinishawesomecoolcolours.png]
  Reply  
Offline Carme
02-06-2010, 08:51 AM,
#38
Member
Posts: 473
Threads: 37
Joined: Jul 2008

Poke..
  Reply  
Offline Tenacity
02-06-2010, 09:43 AM,
#39
Member
Posts: 9,496
Threads: 635
Joined: Apr 2008

Other than the weak shield, the suggested hardpoint setup on page 1 would really make this thing a beast... 4 gb turrets allows for some heavier weaponry or even primary gb turrets for anti-fighter use, but giving it 6 class 10 fighter gun/missile hardpoints allows you to turn this thing into a true missileboat. Fighter missiles take no energy to fire, and they're much faster and more accurate than gunboat missiles - the only downside is the ammo limitation. Still, imagine this thing with 4 gunboat primary turrets, two paralyzer missiles, two cannonball missiles, and two firestalker missiles...

[Image: Tenacity.gif]
Reply  
Offline n00bl3t
02-06-2010, 09:48 AM,
#40
Member
Posts: 7,448
Threads: 108
Joined: Mar 2008

' Wrote:Poke..

DeiSol, long time no see.

Having said that, this is not facebook.

[Image: hG0lGaj.png]
Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.
Reply  
Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode