Bretonia Mining & Manufacturing Feedback

[SeaFalcon]

No, not at all Charos. Keep in mind I have nothing to do with the battleship.

I'm saying it's bad form to call in 2 gunboats additional to whatever forces were already there against 2 snubcraft. I'm not factoring the Dunkirk into the matter as as far as I'm aware, it didn't engage.

If it did, it probably should've stood down until the snubs needed help - but I don't have anything to do with the Dunkirk, so if you're complaining about the battleship's behaviour, don't come whining here. Really, if there's a battleship there and someone is silly enough to engage, that's their fault.

There is nothing preventing them from being supported by nanobot supply. It's sporting to give an equal duel in Conneticut. It's sporting to give a fair fight everywhere else, within bounds. For this reason, I don't believe the battleship should have been firing - yet again, not under my control. I'm not going to order members to die when they have the support available, as it's simply stupid.

Take the loss on the chin gents, act a little more reasonable (in stead of "grow up a bit") and perhaps think twice about engaging people sitting in front of an allied battleship of theirs.

Edit: With regard to the "That's nice" comment; if you have slapped me with the linen glove of duel-challengery sir, you will be defeated should you choose facetious sarcasm as the weapon 8|

BMM- still accepted the trade request, so it's still under your responsibilty.

'They' engaged me, and went crawling for 'their' Battleship when they couldn't get the damage they wanted.
When i didn't get the damage I wanted I called for the Gunboats

Evening out the damage against the enemy 'hull' considering the amount of bots is very unfair I know.
Nothing is preventing me from calling in support when the enemy doesn't plan on giving up.

But you don't like ganks,
so why invite the ones you fight to do it?

No need to answer that for me as I already know the answer.
This was neither qq'ing, it was simply making you aware not everyone agrees with your point of view.

Niether was there a loss, except for time.
BPA popped, BMM popped, Dunkirk docked.


We'll see what happends in the next encounter.

[Champ]

BMM shot at you, BMM retreated to higher ground, and at some point in between you called in reinforcement. I have no problem with this.

You took issue with BMM using available support in order to not-die, in the form of nanobots. I really don't know why.

BMM ended up dying, and you argue they shouldn't have had access to the nanobots. I think this is silly, you think this is reasonable.

At the end of the day, I can't change your opinion. At the moment though, I still run the faction, and if my members are being shot at, whether they were the aggressors or not, I'm not going to issue some directive to die when they have a chance not to. To that end, it's a game, and I'm disappointed that it felt necessary to you to explode it to this extent.

Do hope this doesn't cause some sort of ooRP motivations, but from your tone and insinuations I can't help but think it might've. Have a nice day. :)

---

[dodike]

Is it normal to ask a Dunkirk for bots when fighting against a single snub with a BPA) as escort that did the same?

I felt a bit bad to call two gunboats to drain the earned bots again.

Pilot involved: BMM-Dink.Smallwood.

Shoot the big boats first then there won't be any bot feeding. Tactics.

[Hone]

Sorry to BMM Micheal golanski and the IC escort I DCd on last night with CptHone, power cut. PM me if you wanna resume.

---

User was banned for: Griefing others
Time left: (Permanent)

[Savi]

No problem.

---

Last raid of Discovery 4.86

Bowex S-Convoy

LSC vs Geb