• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 229 230 231 232 233 … 546 Next »
Remade Rheinland Cruiser

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Remade Rheinland Cruiser
Offline frozen
03-16-2011, 03:25 AM,
#31
Member
Posts: 1,948
Threads: 76
Joined: Jul 2007

At a general glance, your model is nice. its more smoother, has more details, and generally looks neater. but dont forget, the RM cruiser is a vanilla ship. the reason why the mesh is so messy is because of the explosion fuses. when the ship blows up, it splits up, and unless you can manage this with your ship, i would strongly suggest you avoid something like this. the general reason why vanilla ships arent touched is because, they're made with alot more advanced stuff that DA had available to them which we dont, which prevents us to mimic their effects, even if we try to optimize their extremely messy mesh designs.


[Image: 5d1144bd1.png]
  Reply  
Offline Hades
03-16-2011, 04:11 AM,
#32
Member
Posts: 513
Threads: 15
Joined: Aug 2008

' Wrote:I would like you send me your model if you could, in OBJ format.
you can email me at thill02@gmail.com, I would like to take a closer inspection of it.
Done.

' Wrote:At a general glance, your model is nice. its more smoother, has more details, and generally looks neater. but dont forget, the RM cruiser is a vanilla ship. the reason why the mesh is so messy is because of the explosion fuses. when the ship blows up, it splits up, and unless you can manage this with your ship, i would strongly suggest you avoid something like this. the general reason why vanilla ships arent touched is because, they're made with alot more advanced stuff that DA had available to them which we dont, which prevents us to mimic their effects, even if we try to optimize their extremely messy mesh designs.
Thanks! And I see, I thought the debris was handled in a similar method to the way they are handled in FreeSpace, where it's modeled separately and a subobject that appears when the ship explodes.
Reply  
Offline MarvinCZ
03-16-2011, 02:01 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-16-2011, 02:07 PM by MarvinCZ.)
#33
Member
Posts: 1,312
Threads: 12
Joined: May 2008

Yep, the debris is made from parts of the model. Only so called "damage caps" are in separate models. That's the mangled remains that are placed on the model in place of a severed component. You can check them in the RMC directory. You'll need those too.

One reason why the vanilla ship has more parts (although 50 sounds really a lot) is because it has 7 components - root + 6 separable

about uv mapping... it's possible, I've seen a FL model with it. Let me ask one question, though: Is it still more efficient when texturing a ship line that could otherwise share textures?
  Reply  
Offline Hades
03-16-2011, 06:10 PM,
#34
Member
Posts: 513
Threads: 15
Joined: Aug 2008

Quote:about uv mapping... it's possible, I've seen a FL model with it. Let me ask one question, though: Is it still more efficient when texturing a ship line that could otherwise share textures?

Depends. On a hard drive level, not as efficient since you'll have a texture for each ship instead of several ships using unified texture sets. As for a shipline? It depends on how FreeLancer parses textures. If you have a RM Cruiser and gunboat in the same area, and FreeLancer parses the textures they they share twice, then no, uvmaps are more efficient in that regard. If FreeLancer parses a texture once when there are multiple ships on screen with it, then yes, tiling would be more efficient than uvmapping on a shipline basis, but uvmapping is usually always better looking and more efficient on a single ship basis.

Quote:Yep, the debris is made from parts of the model. Only so called "damage caps" are in separate models. That's the mangled remains that are placed on the model in place of a severed component. You can check them in the RMC directory. You'll need those too.

One reason why the vanilla ship has more parts (although 50 sounds really a lot) is because it has 7 components - root + 6 separable
Ah, I see. I'll look into finding those.

Also, I went back to make sure, and the RMC cruiser actually has over 1500 seperate little parts in the mesh. Scary.
Reply  
Offline Hades
12-18-2011, 05:32 PM,
#35
Member
Posts: 513
Threads: 15
Joined: Aug 2008

This ain't dead just yet.

http://i293.photobucket.com/albums/mm56/HL...iserupdate2.png
Reply  
Offline Warhalk
12-18-2011, 05:51 PM,
#36
Member
Posts: 230
Threads: 9
Joined: Apr 2011

Nice idea. But with 4.86 2 weeks away? A little late to even bother. 2+ years for 4.86 so 4.87 is wayyyyyy off.
Reply  
Offline schlurbi
12-18-2011, 07:04 PM,
#37
Member
Posts: 4,688
Threads: 187
Joined: Apr 2009

' Wrote:Nice idea. But with 4.86 2 weeks away? A little late to even bother. 2+ years for 4.86 so 4.87 is wayyyyyy off.
Home come you know? Apparently you don't even know what Developers want to do after 4.86

Hades, continue your Work. Please.

"Who is it doing this synthetic type of alpha beta psychedelic funkin'?"
[Image: Newgoldensigfinishawesomecoolcolours.png]
  Reply  
Offline Curios
12-18-2011, 07:23 PM,
#38
Member
Posts: 2,719
Threads: 88
Joined: Sep 2009

Vanilla model replacement?

No way.

I mean, why to? We have a plenty of sheetcrap imports out there, so why to replace what is not broken?

[Image: bhglogo.png]
Reply  
Offline (ツ)
12-18-2011, 08:09 PM,
#39
Member
Posts: 523
Threads: 19
Joined: Sep 2011

Hades, i like your idea, but will it slowly blow up like the vanilla one does?

That biplane just shot down my jet!
  Reply  
Offline Syrus
12-18-2011, 08:40 PM,
#40
Member
Posts: 1,583
Threads: 86
Joined: Mar 2010

I'm sorry, but I see no reason why any of the vanilla ships should be replaced. They define the original Freelancer style and are what you should orientate your models on. They have a lot of nice stuff about them - like the slow exploding caps - and look fine as they are. That is, texture-wise and model-wise.

So, it's a bit of waste work here. Your model might be very nice, but it's not needed.
I'm strongly against replacing the original ships.

[Image: 7tAtSZe.png]
Reply  
Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode