Reducing pvp death consequences to avoid ''gank'' rants.

[Remilia Scarlet]

Remilia, reducing the negative consequences of pvp defeat would also perhaps reduce these things like asteroid hugging (T37), base hugging (Java/Cali), run&dock&come back, etc... all these things that are generally considered "dick moves".

If losing would not mean as much as it does at the moment, perhaps some people could pvp in a more relaxed manner... the general gaming would profit from that, in my opinion.

No, it will not.

---

Where the end starts | Submergence | Awaken | Scarlet D(a\o)wn | Remilia wiki page
BECAUSE YOU DON'T SAY SLAUGHTER WITHOUT LAUGHTER

[Pavel]

On the other hand Jack, it would mean even more ganking and base hugging, as you'd need to fight enemies two times sooner. Pretty much same situation like with nerfing gunboat turrets damage, gunboats kill snubs, impossible.... Will it mean we have gunboat razor snipers all over the place around? No, it will mean more ganking and base hugging.

[Jack_Henderson]

Seems you guys lack a little optimism. Here, have some. I have more than enough

*hands out little pink packages of "optimism +4" in a wrapping with smileys*

---

+ IMG| DISCORD: https://discord.gg/TWrGWjp
+ IMG| IS RECRUITING: Click to find out more!

[lw'nafh]

Seems you guys lack a little optimism. Here, have some. I have more than enough

*hands out little pink packages of "optimism +4" in a wrapping with smileys*

You'll probably go 'OMG KANGA U SO WRONG HUEHUEHUEHUE' for the sake of disagreeing with me, but it's valid in human psychology to say that the best indicator of future behaviour is past and current trends.

We're all human here.

Ergo, at large, we'll all continue to be morons.

---

вellυм ѕe ιpѕυм aleт