• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 447 448 449 450 451 … 546 Next »
Eppy got Bored (duh) So Here's a New Toy

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (9): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 9 Next »
Eppy got Bored (duh) So Here's a New Toy
Offline Jinx
12-30-2007, 04:47 AM,
#21
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

well, aren t foreward guns "turrets" now anyway? - anyway - this ship looks big for a GB - and i think 1 gun + 5 turrets ( just like kusari ) is just enough. [ 1 gun and 4 foreward arc // 1 pure backwards + the 4 foreward turrets, and to balance it out, make it so the turrets have a 360 degree arc - but cannot spin around ( so it takes time to spin into the lower/upper part of the arc )]

making it as big as the lunchbox won t really work, i think. the corsair GB is very massive, this one looks skeletal. - by the looks, i d see it roughly the size / agility of the kusari GB. so why not simply copy / paste its statistics along with its weapon characteristics. easy thing, and the kusari gunboat isn t exactly bad. it lacks firepower, but its agile - if it wasn t a vanilla ship, it would even sustain missiles / mines.

besides, i think agility is to outcasts what armor is to corsairs.

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Offline Eppy
12-30-2007, 04:52 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-30-2007, 04:55 AM by Eppy.)
#22
Member
Posts: 3,865
Threads: 162
Joined: Apr 2007

Independent Corsairs, ladies and gents. Ninety percent of Corsairs are independent; even the factionized are likely to keep their own private ships, just because it's such an effective ship, for pirating OR combat. I'll bet actual real world money that seventy percent or more of the Corsair players here have their own Gunboats. Anyways, This model is intended to be a little longer than the IMG gunboat, but not nearly so...SLENDER. DOOM.

...

:dry:

I will NEVER get over that. You do NOT get destroyed by four Gunboats. Ever.

But whatever. Happier times, friends ^.^

EDIT: Sorry, Jinx, missed your post. I think it needs to be bigger than the Kusari Gunboat. That thing doesn't have enough firepower, I think for anybody's tastes. Four guns isn't enough, even for something that small. I need a higher hit probability. Some of us ain't got the luxury of an Uber frame rate T.T

Quote:Quick comment - we thought that Panzer was the Leader, Swift. -Agmen
Eppy Wrote:Which Dreadnought was that?
n00bl3t Wrote:One of your nine. Tongue
Reply  
Offline bluntpencil2001
12-30-2007, 04:54 AM,
#23
Member
Posts: 5,088
Threads: 66
Joined: May 2007

I think countering gunboat whoring with the same might cause issues.

And yes, the proliferation of Corsair handbags makes me cry too. Figuratively speaking, of course...

[Image: sig-9566.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Qunitinius~Verginix
12-30-2007, 04:56 AM,
#24
Member
Posts: 2,777
Threads: 61
Joined: Aug 2006

That thing looks alright, but it looks kind of spindly, and it might break in half really easy. I sujjest beefing it up somewhat, make it look bigger and cap-ship-ish, instead of thin and almsot bomber-ish.

Verg

[Image: qvsigaz9.gif]
  Reply  
Offline Eppy
12-30-2007, 04:59 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-30-2007, 05:00 AM by Eppy.)
#25
Member
Posts: 3,865
Threads: 162
Joined: Apr 2007

Heehee...that's the beauty of the Structural Integrity Fields. It can look like absolute crap, the magic energy field will hold it together. What, that's how Captain Kirk did it:$Making it beefier sort of kill the feeling that says Outcast, imho... we're all about slender and knife-like things, not tanks. Cough. Cough. Corsairs. Cough. The original design was actually about forty percent slimmer, believe it or not.

Quote:Quick comment - we thought that Panzer was the Leader, Swift. -Agmen
Eppy Wrote:Which Dreadnought was that?
n00bl3t Wrote:One of your nine. Tongue
Reply  
Offline RingoW
12-30-2007, 05:03 AM,
#26
Member
Posts: 1,399
Threads: 65
Joined: Aug 2007

Have i missed something?

It could never become OC Gunboat. They have a cruiser and two battleships and no resources to build an additional Gunbot.:haha:. Just kidding.

A bit more tuning in detail please. Its to edgy. Oh and i know from a higher level, that more forward guns are not really welcome, but maybe there will be an exception.

Good base for further developments.

Respectful
AoM
Reply  
Offline Eppy
12-30-2007, 05:08 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-30-2007, 05:09 AM by Eppy.)
#27
Member
Posts: 3,865
Threads: 162
Joined: Apr 2007

...It's a Gunboat; it's small. There isn't really much more you can do for detail unless you want me to just work on jacking up the Poly count, in which case I would be happy to give Mohr more to do:no:Anyways, any suggestions, to that effect? If it can be more detailed, then I don't see why not:mellow:...I know more forward guns aren't exactly appreciated, but this seems like this one has a niche, considering all the other fun things the Outcasts do with Heavy Weaponry.

Also:

Joke about our resources like that again and I'll toss ya.:nono:

Quote:Quick comment - we thought that Panzer was the Leader, Swift. -Agmen
Eppy Wrote:Which Dreadnought was that?
n00bl3t Wrote:One of your nine. Tongue
Reply  
Offline Dopamino
12-30-2007, 05:22 AM,
#28
Member
Posts: 3,522
Threads: 70
Joined: Jul 2007

You're already submitting your design?
Yikes!
I better contract someone to model my concept for the BW/Outcast GB fast!

No offense Eppy, but I really don't care for your design. It fits well with your Outcast Battleship, but not as well with the rest of the Outcast ships.*

*Just Dopamino's (usually) controversial opinion.

[Image: GlossyNew2copy-1.png]
I mostly lurk around Media Center these days.
  Reply  
Offline Eppy
12-30-2007, 05:25 AM,
#29
Member
Posts: 3,865
Threads: 162
Joined: Apr 2007

...why not?:mellow:

Quote:Quick comment - we thought that Panzer was the Leader, Swift. -Agmen
Eppy Wrote:Which Dreadnought was that?
n00bl3t Wrote:One of your nine. Tongue
Reply  
Offline Dopamino
12-30-2007, 05:33 AM,
#30
Member
Posts: 3,522
Threads: 70
Joined: Jul 2007

It's too spindly and the edges of the wings are too square. most of the faces on it are flat. I just think it need more work detailing it. It looks too rough to me for Outcast technology. Plus I'm biased because I have my own idea of what it should look like which I hope to have modeled soon.

[Image: GlossyNew2copy-1.png]
I mostly lurk around Media Center these days.
  Reply  
Pages (9): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 9 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode