• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion Discovery Mod Balance
« Previous 1 … 23 24 25 26 27 … 55 Next »
Gallia-- Brigands allowed usage of cruisers.

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »
Gallia-- Brigands allowed usage of cruisers.
Offline SMI-Great.Fox
04-26-2012, 10:06 AM,
#1
Member
Posts: 2,670
Threads: 364
Joined: Mar 2009

I know that there have been a few of these posts before, but this needs to be addressed to hopefully boost activity in Gallia.

The brigands are proven to be the largest unlawful group within Gallia, operating a total 12 bases and 1 shared planet.
Known Brigand bases are:

Aurillac - Auvergne
Levroux - Berry
Epernay - Champange
Besancon Freeport
Pelussin - Lyonnias
Ecommoy - Maine
Salbris - Orleanais
Boulogne - Picardy
Mountauban - Roussillion
Montbard - Burgundy
Valence - Dauphine
Narbonne - Languedoc
Planet Marne - Champange

There are many pro's and con's on allowing such a group cruiser usage. From ability to take on heavier Lawful targets and ample supplies in the debris fields to construct such, to the lack of a ship model and lack of a shipyard to construct.

I wish for this to be discussed to have the ID support cruisers. Only known one we can use is the Council class obstinate unless someone comes up to make up one for an update.

We did have Jinx act as our modeller for a cruiser, but with no ID support in such we couldn't even submit it.

If you the community have any comments or idea's onto such, please state so. But keep such on track with the topic and trolling need not respond.

-"If we do not learn at least one thing a day....Our minds turn to stupor"- Kyle Sparrgrove -2005
[+]
http://i849.photobucket.com/albums/ab53/Vandread010/BAF_1_FltAdm_zps4239822d.jpg
http://i849.photobucket.com/albums/ab53/...e32039.jpg
http://i849.photobucket.com/albums/ab53/...89ade0.jpg
While the signature did not break any rules before, the lack of third party hosting caused your signature to take up over half of the page. Until the problem is fixed, I'll have to revert those images to links. ~Inferno
Ships Log of the Maverick IV Logs of the Maverick.V  The.Maverick.IV & Maverick.V Feedback Lot How it all began...
Reply  
Offline SparkyRailgun
04-26-2012, 10:19 AM,
#2
Member
Posts: 1,454
Threads: 26
Joined: Jan 2012

Pirate factions shouldn't have capital ships.
Such is the same for the Mollys, Rogs, but it's unlikely the Scylla will be removed.

Factions like the Blood Dragons and Hessians are fine, considering they are in active war (the former could go without it's caps, though), but the Brigands certainly have no legitimate use for heavy hitters.

It defies the entire idea of striking fast, getting what you want and disappearing into the woods/fog/asteroids.

[Image: mythbusters_busted..png]

[Image: TQBpX.png]
Reply  
Offline Wraga
04-26-2012, 10:31 AM,
#3
Storm Chaser
Posts: 1,767
Threads: 260
Joined: Sep 2010

Personally I have no problem about cruiser usage by unlawfull/pirate factions since they could build their own. However this could start something where every faction wants his own.

Since Gallia is a dead place and Brigands could be the only one active enough unlawfull faction there, I support the idea.

Some additional things what could serve the gameplay isnt hurt. They couldnt use a cruiser for piracy but it could help them to act better against GRN, what is dead already...

Gallia still sux...

[Image: giphy.gif]
  Reply  
Offline AeternusDoleo
04-26-2012, 11:35 AM,
#4
Ex-Developer
Posts: 5,744
Threads: 149
Joined: Nov 2009

No. Capital ships belong to factions that have an agenda to claim and hold space. The brigands have no such desire (some Brigand -players- might, but that's the Council's role. Brigands are pirates, largely similar to the Liberty Rogues in their disorganized but widespread state). Therefor they should not be using capitals. Including cruisers.

We already have way too many unlawfuls fielding navies that are WAY outside of the scope of what the faction could sustain (Hessians, Sairs, Casts). Adding more to the mix isn't going to help matters. If there's any other Gallic unlawful faction that should be using cruisers, it's the Maquis (but it's not their MO).

Wide awake in a world that sleeps, enduring thoughts, enduring scenes. The knowledge of what is yet to come.
From a time when all seems lost, from a dead man to a world, without restraint, unafraid and free.


Mostly retired Discovery member. May still visit from time to time.
Reply  
Offline kikatsu
04-26-2012, 01:04 PM, (This post was last modified: 04-26-2012, 01:06 PM by kikatsu.)
#5
Member
Posts: 2,199
Threads: 253
Joined: Jul 2008

The Brigands are not master shipbuilders, they can get things done but they cannot do it as well as others. Besides, the use of one is limited from their perspective, Brigands are not the most coordinated or motivated people (save for by money). Besides, Brigands should avoid the GRN, work with the GRP, and run circles around the Corse while supplying Council bases...not just popping royal ships.
I think you just want a Cruiser so the LE can have it, the Brigands themselves really have no place for such a thing (Naw the LE are not Brigands in my mind, just something like the Hellfire Legion).
Reply  
Offline SparkyRailgun
04-26-2012, 01:10 PM,
#6
Member
Posts: 1,454
Threads: 26
Joined: Jan 2012

' Wrote:I think you just want a Cruiser so the LE can have it, the Brigands themselves really have no place for such a thing (Naw the LE are not Brigands in my mind, just something like the Hellfire Legion).

The LE trying to have ships they shouldn't?
That's ridiculous! :nyam:

[Image: TQBpX.png]
Reply  
Offline Lanakov
04-26-2012, 01:19 PM,
#7
MNG
Posts: 989
Threads: 73
Joined: Nov 2008

Brigands are disorganized and independent by lore. They're supposed to work together cell by cell, not act as a standing united nation. That would be ridiculous.
Besides, taking on heavy GRN targets ? Really ?

All the Brigands did during the war was lending the occasional hand to the Council forces. They have no interest at all in active warfare against the Navy, and this is made obvious from the storyline. Leave cruisers to the Council. Even Maquisards don't use them because they rely on hit & run tactics in their war against Navy.

Not only aren't the Brigands firmly backed by the Council as Maquis does (ie no large ship-building capabilities), they're even less organized and not interested by war.
If you're after a cruiser just to pew gallics, you're in the wrong faction.

Feedback, insults, marriage proposals and declarations of fealty
(06-14-2019, 12:25 PM)Sombra Hookier Wrote: If everyone was a bit more like Lanakov, the entire world would be more positive. Including pregnancy tests.
Reply  
Offline Yber
04-26-2012, 03:03 PM, (This post was last modified: 04-26-2012, 03:03 PM by Yber.)
#8
Member
Posts: 1,665
Threads: 97
Joined: Jul 2011

Brigands have their own cruiser. It's called asco:crazy:.

Nah, seriously, why should factions like Rogues or unioners cruisers, while the Brigands don't? It looks fine for me.

[Image: 4sFHsTF.png]
(06-19-2016, 12:06 PM)Mao Wrote: inb4 Sirius gets renamed to XTF.
Reply  
Offline xiphos
04-26-2012, 03:11 PM,
#9
Farmerking! | Wikibaron!
Posts: 955
Threads: 23
Joined: Dec 2010

' Wrote:Brigands have their own cruiser. It's called asco:crazy:.

Nah, seriously, why should factions like Rogues or unioners cruisers, while the Brigands don't? It looks fine for me.

By this logic we should allow every faction a cruiser. Which is kinda stupid

[Image: gusWCDQ.png]

Discovery Wikipedia • Wiki Subforum • Tutorials • Tutorial Database • Unofficial Faction Database
Reply  
Offline SparkyRailgun
04-26-2012, 03:12 PM,
#10
Member
Posts: 1,454
Threads: 26
Joined: Jan 2012

' Wrote:Nah, seriously, why should factions like Rogues or unioners cruisers, while the Brigands don't? It looks fine for me.

Just because a bad precedent has been set, doesn't mean it should be followed.
Also, your sig is much too large.

[Image: TQBpX.png]
Reply  
Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode