Civlian Bomber "Roc" MkII

[pchwang]

I think that it would be best if you just removed one of the top fins and centered it.

It's kinda redundant, having two fins right next to each other. Everything else is fine though.

---

[7:42:05 PM][6:51:36 PM] Igor (Smokey): btw terry
[6:51:48 PM] Terrance Cooper: Ye?
[6:52:00 PM] Igor (Smokey): nothin
[6:52:03 PM] Igor (Smokey): just sayin btw
[6:52:05 PM] Terrance Cooper: <_<

Johnny_Haas: you shot anti criuse speed rockets!!!
Johnny_Haas: but why????
Johnny_Haas: ??
Johnny_Haas: why you shoot criuse speed rockets?

[Dusty Lens]

*cough*

Oh, hey, man, wonder how this thing's going.

Yeah. Yup.

[Got Lag?]

Okay, here are the comparison sheets (due to probable size issues, I provide the pictures in links, 56k users be warned). The models are viewed in wireframes and the respective names of the ships are written near their wireframe model:
Top view
Front view
Side view

@chopper: There is the quote function at the bottom right of every post. Might want to check out.;)

EDIT: I just noticed you didn't post in here, AoM. Don't want to give me the seal of approval on this one?:P

This is by far the sexiest version you've posted. I love it!

[I_m_rdy]

Actually, this one is finished. Pictures are here:






I took the old model from my backups again, scaled it a bit and tried McNeo's suggestion.

One side note: I noticed that some materials (textures) are duplicated, but have several suffixes... The materials with suffixes have additional values in the UTF Editor. I guess if I use the same values on the same materials then the ship will more look like the original model. I think I can reach the same with the Order Bomber...

---

[Jinx]

allright - now its perfect ...

the only critizism i have is .... it looks more agile than the eagle now. ( prolly cause the general shape is more cone like than the eagle, which is - as a whole more cylindrical ) and the windshield is more elongated / stretched.

keep it that way - its great.

one more thing..... can you move the body hardpoints to the wingtips? and maybe turn them level 9 ( so it would have 2x10 and 2x9 guns ) - if the intention is to have a bomber that is among the most agile ones AND civilian - shouldn t it be a little less armed than the military versions? or is that unfair compared to the other bombers?

---

Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC

[McNeo]

Perfect!

Okay, dont change it. Looks sleek and perfect for the civies!

[I_m_rdy]

Well, I had to change something on it. Notice the position of the torpedo tubes? AoM noticed it for good, it looked pretty horrible.

I quickly changed the position and voila:


@Jinx: I fear it has to stay that way... The wingtips on the Eagle had no weapon mounts which looks better IMO. The mounts at the cockpit will stay, though unused (it fulfils another FL criteria - unused hardpoint mounts)

---

[Etaphreven]

Oh, yes. Just noticed that. Looks better now.

[cmfalconer]

Man I can't wait to fly this thing. Looks great! much improved over what's in-game now. Thank you for the work I m rdy. Well done

---

.

[I_m_rdy]

Thanks, I started to feel bad after that disgraceful pile what I once called Civilian Bomber. Hope this one gets Roc included in the infocard...

So this is it, right? I can convert it to CMP, assign the hardpoints, do the MAT changes in the UTF editor, resize the Eagle SUR for the ship and get the icon for it?

So now we can say it... "The pregnant Eagle gave birth!":P

---